ArticlePsychophysiology2025
Interpersonal Physiological Linkage Between People With Behavioral Variant Frontotemporal Dementia and Alzheimer's Disease and Their Informal Caregivers.
Article in Psychophysiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Physiological linkage, which refers to the degree that people's peripheral physiological responses change in coordinated ways, has been linked to a variety of psychiatric and developmental conditions. In contrast, physiological linkage in neurological conditions has been understudied. Behavioral variant frontotemporal dementia (bvFTD) is characterized by debilitating impairments in socioemotional functioning, including connections with others. We hypothesized that physiological linkage during interactions with loved ones would be reduced in bvFTD. During unrehearsed 10-min discussions of an area of disagreement in 86 dyads (n = 40 bvFTD; n = 35 Alzheimer's disease [AD]; n = 11 healthy controls), we computed dyadic physiological linkage using a composite of six peripheral physiological measures (i.e., heart rate, skin conductance, finger pulse amplitude, finger pulse transmission time, ear pulse transmission time, somatic activity). Specifically, we computed in-phase, anti-phase, and combined physiological linkage to examine each dyad's coordinated physiological changes that occur exclusively in the same direction (i.e., positively correlated), opposite direction (i.e., negatively correlated), or in either direction (i.e., correlated regardless of whether the correlation is positive or negative). Results indicate that bvFTD dyads had significantly lower combined (but not in-phase or anti-phase) physiological linkage compared to AD and healthy control dyads. To the extent that physiological linkage reflects social connection, these findings are consistent with the deficits in socio-emotional functioning that characterize bvFTD. We offer several possible explanations for this finding and consider implications for future research and clinical assessment of dyadic interpersonal processes in dementia and related disorders.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.