Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40770815›Full record

ArticleResearch involvement and engagement2025

Doing community involvement care-fully: using an ethic of care to guide involvement in research on women's health after pregnancy complications and loss.

Bec Jenkinson, Melanie McKenzie, Ayme Limmer, Valerie Charlton, Leah Hardiman, Anna Lee Ura, Sheleigh Lawler, Carissa Bonner, Jenny Doust

Abstract readLetter
In one paragraph

Article in Research involvement and engagement, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. No Ethics Needed? Towards an Ethics of Care for Public and Patient Involvement and Engagement.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2026
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Bec JenkinsonSchool of Public Health, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia. r.jenkinson@uq.edu.au.
Melanie McKenzieLived Experience Expert Group member, representing Harrison's Little Wings, Brisbane, Australia.
Ayme LimmerLived Experience Expert Group member, Brisbane, Australia.
Valerie CharltonLived Experience Expert Group member, representing Australian Action on Pre-eclampsia, Brisbane, Australia.
Leah HardimanLived Experience Expert Group member, Brisbane, Australia.
Anna Lee UraLived Experience Expert Group member, representing Australasian Birth Trama Association, Gold Coast, Australia.
Sheleigh LawlerSchool of Public Health, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.
Carissa BonnerSchool of Public Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
Jenny DoustSchool of Public Health, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.

Funding

National Health and Medical Research Council,Australia APP1153420
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Consumer and Community Involvement (CCI) occurs when people with lived experience collaborate with researchers to design and conduct research. CCI has widely accepted benefits and is increasingly expected by funders and publishers. However, researchers may also be concerned about how to conduct CCI ethically, especially because human research ethical review processes are poorly aligned with the intentions of CCI. We explore how an Ethic of Care framework, emphasizing attentiveness, responsibility, competence, responsiveness, and solidarity, was used to guide CCI in a recent project about women's health and healthcare experiences in the years after pregnancy complications and loss (a population, bereaved women, that might be considered vulnerable). Informed by an Ethic of Care we invited Australian maternity consumer organisations to nominate representatives to form a Lived Experience Expert group, who made meaningful contributions to study design and recruitment, data collection, analysis and interpretation, and the development of study outputs. Our Care Ethical approach prioritised addressing power imbalances and creating meaningful opportunities to influence all aspects of the study, including communicating how advice was actioned. It delivered ongoing relationships with consumer representatives and their organisations, as well as capacity building for both consumers and researchers. An Ethic of Care can guide authentic CCI to ensure reciprocity, prevent tokenism, and foster long-term relationships and mutual trust between researchers and consumers, demonstrating that the early and authentic involvement of vulnerable populations is both feasible and beneficial.

Indexed as

Consumer involvementEthic of careEthics, researchParticipatory researchPatient and public involvementWomen’s health

Identifiers

PMID40770815
PMCPMC12326668

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.