Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40770781›Full record

ArticleEnvironmental microbiome2025

Microbiome matters: how transplantation methods and donor origins shape the successful restoration of the seagrass Posidonia oceanica.

Arnaud Boulenger, Tânia Aires, Aschwin H Engelen, Gerard Muyzer, Michel Marengo, Sylvie Gobert

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Environmental microbiome, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Arnaud BoulengerLaboratory of Oceanology, MARE Centre, UR FOCUS, University of Liege, Liege, Belgium. arnaud.boulenger@doct.uliege.be.
Tânia AiresCentro de Ciências do Mar (CCMAR), Centro de Investigação Marinha e Ambiental (CIMAR), Universidade do Algarve, Faro, Portugal.
Aschwin H EngelenCentro de Ciências do Mar (CCMAR), Centro de Investigação Marinha e Ambiental (CIMAR), Universidade do Algarve, Faro, Portugal.
Gerard MuyzerMicrobial Systems Ecology, Department of Freshwater and Marine Ecology, Institute for Biodiversity and Ecosystem Dynamics, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Michel MarengoSTAtion de REcherche Sous-marines et Océanographiques (STARESO), Calvi, France.
Sylvie GobertLaboratory of Oceanology, MARE Centre, UR FOCUS, University of Liege, Liege, Belgium.

Funding

Biodiversa RESTORESEASFonds National de la Recherche Scientifique - FNRS ASP 40006932Portuguese national funds FCT UIDB/04326/2020Rhone-Mediterranean and Corsican Water Agency STARECAPMEDTerritorial Collectivity of Corsica STARECAPMEDUniversity of Liege FSR2021
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPosidonia oceanica forms extensive seagrass meadows in the Mediterranean Sea, providing key ecosystem services. However, these meadows decline due to anthropogenic pressures like anchoring and coastal development. Transplantation-based restoration has been explored for decades, yet the role of the plant-associated microbiome in restoration success remains largely unknown.

results16 S rRNA gene amplicon sequencing was used to investigate how different transplantation methods and donor origins influence the bacterial communities of P. oceanica cuttings two years post-transplantation. We tested three transplantation methods, iron staples, coconut fiber mats, and BESE elements, and compared them with control meadows and donor populations from two different origins: naturally uprooted storm-fragments and intermatte cuttings manually harvested from established meadows. Our results show that transplantation methods strongly shape bacterial communities in seagrass roots. Iron staples promoted microbial assemblages most similar to natural meadows, likely due to direct sediment contact enhancing recruitment of key functional bacterial orders such as Chromatiales and Desulfobacterales. In contrast, BESE elements and coconut fiber mats displayed dissimilar bacterial communities compared to control meadows, likely due to material composition and physical separation between the cuttings and the sediment. Donor origin had only subtle effects on bacterial communities' structure, although intermatte cuttings showed higher abundances of Candidatus Thiodiazotropha, a genus thought to be involved sulfur oxidation and nitrogen fixation.

conclusionOur results demonstrate that transplantation methods strongly influence root-associated bacterial communities. Limited sediment contact in elevated substrates delayed the establishment of key functional bacteria, highlighting the importance of direct interaction with the sediment microbial pool. These results imply that restoration strategies should prioritize methods enhancing sediment-root interactions to support microbial recovery. Incorporating microbiome considerations, such as optimized substrates or microbial inoculation, could improve the resilience and long-term success of P. oceanica restoration.

Indexed as

HolobiontMicrobiomeRestorationRhizosphereSeagrassSymbiosisTransplantation

Identifiers

PMID40770781
PMCPMC12326751

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.