ArticleJournal of translational medicine2025
School-level prediction and management of myopia in children and adolescents.
Article in Journal of translational medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Prevalence of myopia in Chinese children and adolescents: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Journal of global health · 2026Pooled it
- Artificial intelligence for pathologic myopia classification based on the META-PM system: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in physiology · 2026Pooled it
- The application of artificial intelligence in myopia prediction for children and adolescents: a review.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2026Review
- Binocular Non-Cycloplegic Ocular Parameters for Modeling Cycloplegic SER in Children.Translational vision science & technology · 2026Article
- Early identification of myopia risk in children through school-based vision screening: a longitudinal cohort study.BMC public health · 2026Article
- Multimodal natural language processing in ophthalmology: bridging clinical text and medical imaging.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
19 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundPrevious Artificial Intelligence (AI) models are mainly based on hospital data to predict myopia progression in myopic children. However, school-level AI models for predicting myopia onset in non-myopic children are lacking. There is a need for more precise and comprehensive tools for full myopia management, from the onset of myopia to its progression.
methodsThis study was conducted in 870 centers dispersed across seven cities in China from September 2019 to December 2021, with participants observed for two years. Machine learning models were trained and internally validated on datasets from Shenzhen, and then externally tested from the other six cities. Of 1,123,602 children and adolescents aged 4-18 years old, 1,105,271 individuals were confirmed eligible. After two-year follow-up, 915,991 individuals were included in analysis. Data were analyzed from June 2022 to July 2023. Main outcomes and measures are the occurrence of myopia, and the change of spherical equivalent refraction in 2 years.
resultsOf 915,991 participants, 405,784 (44.3%) were identified as myopic at baseline. In two years, the occurrence of myopia was 45.5% and the overall myopic shift was - 0.97 ± 1.32D. The optimal machine learning models were established for predicting myopia occurrence in non-myopic individuals; and predicting progression of any amount (defined as an annual progression of < - 0.25D) in myopic individuals. The performance in predicting occurrence (AUC 0.962, 95% CI 0.956-0.968) and progression (AUC 0.923, 95% CI 0.912-0.934) were acceptable in the external test set. The interactions between age and other variables were revealed by the algorithms, and hence the final prediction models were established based on age segmentation. In the external test set, the performance of the models for both 4-11-years (occurrence prediction: AUC 0.978, 95% CI 0.972-0.984; progression prediction: AUC 0.957, 95% CI 0.951-0.963) and 11-18-years age groups (occurrence prediction: AUC 0.966, 95% CI 0.960-0.972; progression prediction: AUC 0.928, 95% CI 0.917-0.939) were improved. Finally, user-friendly software was developed, which makes this model accessible for school use.
conclusionsThe algorithm developed in the current study for predicting myopia occurrence and progression showed excellent performance in school settings using real-world data, indicating its potential application in school-level myopia management. Trial registration chictr.org Identifier: ChiCTR2200057391.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.