ArticleBMC public health2025
Using black knowledges to recognise and address barriers to COVID-19 vaccination in Malawi.
Article in BMC public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundA Black Geographies framework offers a perspective through which the rich and complex histories and knowledges of African nations, and the people themselves, can be explored to reveal barriers to vaccination and solutions to achieving global vaccine access and equity. This research centres Malawi as a case study and seeks to (1) identify barriers to COVID-19 vaccination; (2) situate these barriers within geographic scales, ranging from the local to the global; and, (3) identify the role of the (Black) individual in creating, perpetuating, navigating and overcoming these barriers.
methodsThe study employed a qualitative approach, using in-depth semi-structured interviews with 41 key informants in Malawi between September and December 2021 to explore barriers to vaccination. Recruitment focused on ensuring diverse perspectives based on occupation, location, gender, and ethnicity. Among the informants, 26 were men and 15 were women; 31 lived in rural areas and 10 in urban areas; 21 had completed secondary school, while 20 had not. Twenty interviews were conducted in English, while 21 were in either Chitumbuka or Chichewa. Interview transcripts were analysed using the framework method.
resultsResults reveal that the fear of COVID-19 in Malawi was largely tied to disruptions in cultural practices like burials, creating anxiety about “meaningless deaths” without proper rites. This fear, rooted in the community’s lifeworlds, contributed to vaccine hesitancy, compounded by a history of colonial exploitation and racial mistrust, with some believing that the vaccine was designed to harm them (Black peoples and/or Africans). Structural barriers such as vaccine nationalism and logistics posed challenges in Malawi, further hindering access. In response, Malawi’s government developed culturally specific public health strategies, leveraging traditional and social media, community leaders, and a dual approach that combined Western and traditional medicine to promote vaccination. This Malawian approach emphasises the importance of acknowledging local knowledges, cultural practices, and Black spatial agency in navigating and addressing vaccine uptake.
conclusionsThis study underscores the critical importance of integrating Black knowledges and voices into vaccine rollout and distribution policies. Through the lens provided by the Black Geographies framework, we highlight the analytical strength of Blackness and Black knowledges. The study identifies barriers to vaccination in Black communities and proposes solutions rooted in these perspectives. Furthermore, it emphasises the need to acknowledge present-day global power dynamics in vaccine messaging and distribution to ensure equitable access and benefits for populations worldwide.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.