SynthesisBMC pregnancy and childbirth2025
Fibrinogen and D-dimer protein levels in patients with preeclampsia: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Prognostic value of the early D-dimer/fibrinogen ratio in critically ill patients requiring vascular surgery: a retrospective study.BMC anesthesiology · 2026Article
- Effectiveness of evidence-based nursing protocols in managing postpartum hemorrhage after vaginal delivery: a prospective observational quality-improvement evaluation.Archives of gynecology and obstetrics · 2026Observational
- Second-Trimester Fibrinogen-to-Albumin Ratio and Platelet Activation Markers Compared with the HALP Score for Predicting Preeclampsia.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionPreeclampsia (PE) is a significant obstetric and global health concern associated with fetal growth restriction, poor placental perfusion, and maternal organ dysfunction. Early detection through simple, routine antenatal indicators is essential. This systematic review and meta-analysis assessed fibrinogen (FIB) and D-dimer (DD) levels in PE patients compared to normotensive pregnant women.
methodsRelevant articles were systematically identified through comprehensive searches across multiple databases such as PubMed, Scopus, Embase, and Hinari. Utilizing Stata version 14.0, we employed a random-effects model to estimate the pooled standardized mean difference (SMD) along with their corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Heterogeneity was assessed using I
resultsIn total, 31 articles involving 5,846 participants were included in this study. Among these, 2,938 were identified as patients with PE (664 severe PE, 619 mild PE, and 1,655 undefined PE), while 2,908 were normotensive pregnant mothers. The overall pooled standardized mean difference (SMD) for FIB and DD between PE and normotensive pregnant mothers were 0.26 (95% CI: -0.12-0.64, p = 0.18) and 0.81 (95% CI: 0.43-1.18, p < 0.001), respectively. These findings suggest a significant increase in DD levels among PE patients compared to normotensive pregnant mothers, while the elevation in FIB levels among PE patients did not reach statistical significance.
conclusionsThese findings highlight the potential utility of DD as a biomarker for identifying and monitoring PE during pregnancy. However, further research is warranted to elucidate the clinical implications and predictive value of DD levels in the context of PE diagnosis and management. Additionally, the non-significant difference in FIB levels highlights the need for continued investigation into the underlying mechanisms and diagnostic relevance of FIB in PE.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.