ArticleBMC pulmonary medicine2025
Validation of the Distress Thermometer for detecting psychological distress in patients with stable chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: optimal cut-off score and influencing factors.
Article in BMC pulmonary medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Psychosocial distress and associated factors among pneumoconiosis patients: a cross-sectional study.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundPatients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) are at high risk for psychological distress, yet validated screening tools are not routinely used in clinical practice. The Distress Thermometer (DT), originally developed for cancer patients, is a brief screening tool for detecting psychological distress. However, the optimal cut-off in COPD patients remains unclear.
aimThis study aims to validate the DT for use in stable COPD patients and to explore factors influencing psychological distress.
methodsA cross-sectional study was conducted involving 386 stable COPD patients. Data were collected using sociodemographic questionnaires, the DT, and the Hospital Anxiety and Depression scale (HADS). Receiver Operating Characteristics (ROC) analysis was employed to determine the predictive metrics of various DT cut-off scores compared to the HADS. Bivariate binary logistic regression was used to identify factors influencing psychological distress. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: This cross-sectional survey study did not involve experimental interventions and therefore did not require registration in a clinical trials platform. However, the study protocol can be retrieved from https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/C3N79 .
resultsThe mean DT reported by patients was 3.77, while the mean total HADS score was 29.68. The DT score showed a high correlation with the total HADS score (r = 0.640). An optimal DT cut-off score of ≥ 5 was identified, yielding a Youden index of 0.815, with sensitivity and specificity of 97.40% and 84.14%, respectively. Using this cut-off score, the incidence of significant psychological distress was found to be 32.1%. Risk factors for psychological distress included gender, number of children, educational level, frequency of exercise, GOLD degree, and number of acute exacerbations.
conclusionsThe DT is a valid screening tool for identifying psychological distress among COPD patients. With an optimal cut-off score of ≥ 5, the DT offers high sensitivity and specificity, making it a reliable measure for clinical use. This study also highlights significant factors contributing to psychological distress, emphasizing the importance of integrating routine psychological assessments and care into the routine management of COPD to improve patient outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.