Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40770628›Full record

ArticleBMC pregnancy and childbirth2025

"We were on lockdown for pretty much my entire pregnancy": a qualitative study of pregnancy care in prisons and jails during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Abaki Beck, Ingie Osman, Ashley N Watson, Aparea Smith, Brittany Seaver, Carolyn Sufrin, Rebecca J Shlafer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Abaki BeckSchool of Public Health, University of Minnesota, 420 Delaware Street S.E, Minneapolis, MN, 55455, USA. beck1369@umn.edu.
Ingie OsmanDepartment of Pediatrics, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
Ashley N WatsonDepartment of Communication, State University of New York at Geneseo, Geneseo, NY, USA.
Aparea SmithCommunity Research Council, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
Brittany SeaverCommunity Research Council, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
Carolyn SufrinDepartment of Gynecology & Obstetrics, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Rebecca J ShlaferDepartment of Pediatrics, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA.

Funding

Pregnancy and Postpartum Support Programs for Women in Prison: Maternal and Neonatal OutcomesR01HD103634 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI SHLAFER, REBECCA J. · 2021 to 2025
$3.0M
Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development 1R01HD103634-01NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD103634
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe number of incarcerated women in the United States has increased dramatically over the past 40 years and each year, and some of them are pregnant. It has been demonstrated that the COVID-19 pandemic negatively impacted incarcerated people in myriad ways: through conditions of confinement resulting in increased exposure to COVID-19, restrictive prison and jail policies intended to decrease the spread of COVID-19, and more. However, there has been little attention to the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the care and treatment of pregnant and postpartum individuals in carceral settings, given their unique needs.

methodsWe conducted interviews with 10 formerly incarcerated women who were incarcerated and were pregnant or postpartum between March 2020 and January 2022. Each transcript was coded by two independent coders. Each phase of this work was guided, in part, by a national Community Research Council (CRC) made up of nine formerly incarcerated people who gave birth or were postpartum while incarcerated.

resultsOur analysis revealed factors specific to the COVID-19 pandemic that exacerbated the harm faced by incarcerated pregnant and postpartum people, as well as factors that mitigated these negative impacts. Exacerbating factors include: (1) the use of quarantine and isolation of pregnant people; (2) unclear and inconsistent prevention guidance; (3) disruptions to communication, visitation, and programming; and (4) negative experiences with carceral facility staff. While these factors negatively impacted individuals' birth experiences, postpartum care, mental health, their relationship with their family, and more, interviewees also discussed factors which mitigated these impacts. Mitigating factors included: (1) support they received from external pregnancy or doula organizations; (2) support they received from incarcerated peers; and (3) self advocacy to improve their living conditions or express bodily autonomy.

conclusionThe COVID-19 pandemic exacerbated existing disparities and inequitable access to perinatal care for incarcerated people. We conclude with a series of policy and practice recommendations that carceral facilities may implement to improve the health and wellbeing of incarcerated pregnant people and their babies.

Indexed as

COVID-19JailsPregnant PeoplePrenatal CarePrisonersPrisonsAdultFemaleHumansPostpartum PeriodPregnancyQualitative ResearchSARS-CoV-2United StatesCOVID-19IncarcerationJailPandemicPerinatalPostpartumPregnancyPrison

Identifiers

PMID40770628
PMCPMC12326673

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.