ArticleAddiction biology2025
Machine Learning Classification of Smoking Behaviours-From Social Environment to the Prefrontal Cortex.
Article in Addiction biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Machine Learning Classification of Smoking Behaviours-From Social Environment to the Prefrontal Cortex.Addiction biology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
20 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The pronounced heterogeneity in smoking trajectories-ranging from occasional or heavy use to successful quitting -highlights substantial interindividual variation within the smoking population. Machine learning is particularly well suited to capture these complex patterns that may be challenging for traditional inferential statistics to uncover. In this study, we applied machine learning to data from a population-based cohort to identify multimodal markers that distinguish smokers from never smokers at baseline and predict long-term cessation success at a 10-year follow-up. We employed 10 times repeated nested cross-validation (10 outer folds, 5 inner folds) to analyse baseline data (T1) from 707 smokers-including 222 heavy smokers (FTND ≥ 4)-and 864 never smokers for smoking status classification. At the 10-year follow-up (T2), we further classified 60 successful quitters (≥ 1 year abstinent) versus 81 non-quitters. Feature importance was assessed using averaged SHAP values derived from test set predictions. Classification models achieved the following performance, expressed by the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC; mean ± SD): smokers versus never smokers, 0.85 ± 0.03; heavy smokers versus never smokers, 0.92 ± 0.03; and quitters versus non-quitters, 0.68 ± 0.13. SHAP analysis identified markers of frontal functioning, cognitive control and smoking behaviour within the social environment among the most influential predictors of both smoking status and cessation success. In conclusion, our machine learning analyses support a multifactorial model of smoking behaviour and cessation success, which may inform nuanced risk stratification to advance the development of personalized cessation strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.