Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40770577›Full record

ArticleNature genetics2025

Noncoding rare variant associations with blood traits in 166,740 UK Biobank genomes.

Diogo M Ribeiro, Robin J Hofmeister, Simone Rubinacci, Olivier Delaneau

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Nature genetics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Diogo M RibeiroDepartment of Computational Biology, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland. diogo.am.ribeiro@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0482-7342
Robin J HofmeisterDepartment of Computational Biology, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9965-595X
Simone RubinacciInstitute for Molecular Medicine Finland (FIMM), University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.
Olivier DelaneauRegeneron Genetics Center, Tarrytown, NY, USA. olivier.delaneau@regeneron.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3906-8446

Funding

Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung (Swiss National Science Foundation) PP00P3_176977
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Large biobanks with whole-genome sequencing (WGS) now enable the association of noncoding rare variants with complex human traits. Given that >98% of the genome is available for exploration, the selection of noncoding variants remains a critical yet unresolved challenge in these analyses. Here we leverage knowledge of blood gene regulation and deleteriousness scores to select noncoding variants pertinent for association with blood-related traits. Integrating WGS and 42 blood cell count and biomarker measurements for 166,740 UK Biobank samples, we perform variant collapsing tests, identifying hundreds of gene-trait associations involving noncoding variants. However, we demonstrate that most of these noncoding rare variant associations (1) reproduce associations known from previous studies and (2) are driven by linkage disequilibrium between nearby common and rare variants. This study underscores the prevailing challenges in rare variant analysis and the need for caution when interpreting noncoding rare variant association results.

Indexed as

Genetic VariationGenome, HumanBiological Specimen BanksGenome-Wide Association StudyHumansLinkage DisequilibriumPolymorphism, Single NucleotideQuantitative Trait LociUK BiobankUnited KingdomWhole Genome Sequencing

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.