Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40770564›Full record

SynthesisInternational journal of impotence research2025

The prognostic role of HPV status in penile squamous cell carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Kaat Vandermaesen, Laura Elst, Claire Defraigne, Laura Langhendries, Yuhong Yuan, Maarten Albersen, Thomas Van den Broeck

Abstract readSystematic ReviewMeta-Analysis
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in International journal of impotence research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Prognostic value of the tumor immune microenvironment, PD-L1 and p16Virchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Kaat VandermaesenUniversity Hospitals Leuven, Department of Urology, Leuven, Belgium.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0008-5212-5020
Laura ElstUniversity Hospitals Leuven, Department of Urology, Leuven, Belgium.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7516-8762
Claire DefraigneUniversity Hospitals Leuven, Department of Urology, Leuven, Belgium.
Laura LanghendriesUniversity Hospitals Leuven, Department of Urology, Leuven, Belgium.
Yuhong YuanDepartment of Medicine, London Health Science Centre, London, Ontario, Department of Medine, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4374-3042
Maarten Albersen *University Hospitals Leuven, Department of Urology, Leuven, Belgium. maarten.albersen@uzleuven.be.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6763-6586
Thomas Van den Broeck *GZA Hospitals Antwerp, Department of Urology, Antwerp, Belgium.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Penile squamous cell carcinoma (PSCC) is a rare but aggressive malignancy that can present as either Human papillomavirus (HPV)-associated or HPV-independent. Currently, there is no consensus on the prognostic value of HPV status in PSCC or its role in guiding treatment strategies. Therefore, in this systematic review and meta-analysis we aim to assess the impact of different methods of determining HPV status on cancer specific survival (CSS) and overall survival (OS) in patients with PSCC. Databases including MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were systematically searched between 1980 and February 2025. Studies were eligible if they assessed HPV status using any method in PSCC patients and reported CSS or OS with a minimum follow-up of two years. Case reports, narrative reviews, expert opinions, and studies reporting less than 50 participants were excluded. Quality of included studies was assessed using the QUIPS tool. A total of 31 studies, published between 2001 and 2024, met the inclusion criteria, all of which were of retrospective design. High risk of bias (RoB) was noted for study attrition, prognostic factor measurement, and study confounding. Sample sizes ranged from 57 to 611 participants (median: 152 participants). HPV-status was assessed through DNA testing in 19 studies and 10 studies used p16 immunohistochemistry (IHC) as a surrogate marker of HPV-driven carcinogenesis. Four studies used both HPV DNA measurements and p16 IHC staining and two articles determined HPV status based on histological subtyping. Median follow-up was 49.9 months (range: 27-107.9 months). We identified 23 studies that reported sufficient data for inclusion in a meta-analysis, encompassing a total of 5291 men with various stages of PSCC. Of these, 1946 (36.8%) had HPV-associated disease. Positive p16 status was associated with improved CSS (HR = 0.40, 95% CI [0.20, 0.80], p = 0.009) and OS (HR = 0.49, 95% CI [0.29, 0.85], p = 0.01) in a pooled cohort of 1266 and 1189 patients respectively. HPV DNA positivity was associated with improved CSS (HR = 0.54, 95% CI [0.35, 0.83], p = 0.005), but not with OS (HR = 0.86 95% CI [0.70, 1.07], p = 0.17). In conclusion, p16 and HPV DNA positivity are associated with improved CSS in patients with PSCC. Positive p16 status was related to better OS, while HPV status based on DNA measurements was not. These findings underscore the prognostic value of p16 and HPV status.

Indexed as

Carcinoma, Squamous CellPapillomaviridaePapillomavirus InfectionsPenile NeoplasmsHumansMalePrognosis

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.