SynthesisInternational journal of impotence research2025
The prognostic role of HPV status in penile squamous cell carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in International journal of impotence research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- From Divergent Guidelines to Delphi-Ready Items: Tutorial for Large Language Model-Assisted Guideline Harmonization Using Penile Cancer as a Worked Example.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Article
- Neoadjuvant Treatment for Penile Cancer: A Systematic Review of Contemporary Evidence.Cancers · 2026Review
- Prognostic value of the tumor immune microenvironment, PD-L1 and p16Virchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology · 2026Article
- IL-12 as a Potential Prognostic Marker in Penile Cancer: Implications for Immune Dysregulation.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Penile squamous cell carcinoma (PSCC) is a rare but aggressive malignancy that can present as either Human papillomavirus (HPV)-associated or HPV-independent. Currently, there is no consensus on the prognostic value of HPV status in PSCC or its role in guiding treatment strategies. Therefore, in this systematic review and meta-analysis we aim to assess the impact of different methods of determining HPV status on cancer specific survival (CSS) and overall survival (OS) in patients with PSCC. Databases including MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were systematically searched between 1980 and February 2025. Studies were eligible if they assessed HPV status using any method in PSCC patients and reported CSS or OS with a minimum follow-up of two years. Case reports, narrative reviews, expert opinions, and studies reporting less than 50 participants were excluded. Quality of included studies was assessed using the QUIPS tool. A total of 31 studies, published between 2001 and 2024, met the inclusion criteria, all of which were of retrospective design. High risk of bias (RoB) was noted for study attrition, prognostic factor measurement, and study confounding. Sample sizes ranged from 57 to 611 participants (median: 152 participants). HPV-status was assessed through DNA testing in 19 studies and 10 studies used p16 immunohistochemistry (IHC) as a surrogate marker of HPV-driven carcinogenesis. Four studies used both HPV DNA measurements and p16 IHC staining and two articles determined HPV status based on histological subtyping. Median follow-up was 49.9 months (range: 27-107.9 months). We identified 23 studies that reported sufficient data for inclusion in a meta-analysis, encompassing a total of 5291 men with various stages of PSCC. Of these, 1946 (36.8%) had HPV-associated disease. Positive p16 status was associated with improved CSS (HR = 0.40, 95% CI [0.20, 0.80], p = 0.009) and OS (HR = 0.49, 95% CI [0.29, 0.85], p = 0.01) in a pooled cohort of 1266 and 1189 patients respectively. HPV DNA positivity was associated with improved CSS (HR = 0.54, 95% CI [0.35, 0.83], p = 0.005), but not with OS (HR = 0.86 95% CI [0.70, 1.07], p = 0.17). In conclusion, p16 and HPV DNA positivity are associated with improved CSS in patients with PSCC. Positive p16 status was related to better OS, while HPV status based on DNA measurements was not. These findings underscore the prognostic value of p16 and HPV status.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40770564What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.