Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40770524›Full record

ArticleEmergency radiology2026

The role of ventilation/perfusion scintigraphy in distinguishing acute from chronic pulmonary embolism.

Hamdi Afşin, Emine Afşin

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Emergency radiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Hamdi AfşinDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Abant Izzet Baysal University, Bolu, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1010-3073
Emine AfşinDepartment of Chest Diseases, Abant Izzet Baysal University, Bolu, Turkey. emineafsin@yahoo.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2450-6378

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn this study, we examined the potential role of V/Q scintigraphy in distinguishing acute PE (APE) from chronic PE (CPE). MATERIALS AND

methodsFrom 2020 to 2023, 36 patients diagnosed with APE and 24 patients diagnosed with CPE were included in the study. Location (segmental, subsegmental, lobar), number and appearance (wedge/patch) of mismatch perfusion defects on V/Q scintigraphy were recorded, and data were compared between the two groups.

resultsThe number of mismatch segmental defects on V/Q scintigraphy was higher in the APE group (p = 0.042). The number of wedge-shaped defects was higher in the APE group (p = 0.003), while patchy defects were more common in the CPE group (p < 0.001). A negative correlation (p = 0.002) was observed between CPE and the number of wedges, whereas a positive correlation (p < 0.001) was found between CPE and the number of patches. Pulse oxygen saturation negatively correlated with the number of patches (p = 0.012). A negative correlation also existed between the number of mismatch segmental defects and CPE (p = 0.041). APE was indicated when the number of wedges was ≥1.5 (75% sensitivity,62% specificity, p = 0.03), while CPE was indicated when the number of patches was ≥0.5 (88% sensitivity, 61% specificity, p < 0.001). Patchy defects were found to be an independent risk factor for CPE (p = 0.008, OR: 2.1, 95% CI: 1.2-3.7).

conclusionPatchy defects serve as an independent risk factor for CPE and correlate with the severity of hypoxemia.

Indexed as

Pulmonary EmbolismVentilation-Perfusion ScanAcute DiseaseAdultAgedChronic DiseaseDiagnosis, DifferentialFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesAcute PEChronic PEPatch appearanceV/Q scintigraphyWedge appearance

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.