ArticleSurgical endoscopy2025
Automated surgical workflow recognition in privacy-preserving depth videos of the operating room.
Article in Surgical endoscopy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundEfficient operating room (OR) workflows have the potential to reduce delays and cancellations, shorten patient waiting lists, and improve satisfaction among patients and staff. Insights for OR efficiency can be extracted from the registration and timing of workflow steps. However, manual registration of these steps is often unreliable. Therefore, we propose to recognize the OR workflow automatically in videos from overhead depth cameras using deep learning. In contrast to regular cameras, depth cameras do not capture fine video details that permit identification of the people recorded. Hence, the privacy of patients and staff is preserved.
methodsWe gathered a video dataset of 21 laparoscopic surgeries captured by three depth cameras positioned in different corners of the OR. The procedures were annotated with four phases describing the OR workflow, i.e., turnover, anesthesia, surgery, and wrap-up. We performed an extensive analysis with spatial and temporal deep learning models, including a comparison between multi- and single-view camera setups, and contrasting post-operative with real-time predictions. Along with standard metrics for workflow recognition, we introduce a new evaluation metric that reflects the error in estimated phase duration.
resultsThe best-performing model, ASFormer, recognized operative phases with 99.7% mean average precision (mAP), enabling the estimation of phase duration with a mean absolute error of 35 seconds. The best-performing spatial model resulted in 89.7% mAP, indicating the importance of temporal modeling. We also found that the three cameras could be replaced by a single camera, with 98.8% mAP, although performance depends on the camera location in the OR. Additionally, we found that real-time prediction is feasible but underperforms with respect to post-operative analysis (94.3% mAP).
conclusionsAutomated OR workflow recognition is possible using existing deep learning techniques based on single- and multi-camera setups. The use of privacy-preserving depth videos and a reasonably low phase duration estimation error could have positive implications for practical use.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.