Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40770511›Full record

ArticleSurgical endoscopy2025

Automated surgical workflow recognition in privacy-preserving depth videos of the operating room.

Beerend G A Gerats, Jelmer M Wolterink, Ivo A M J Broeders

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Surgical endoscopy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Beerend G A GeratsSurgery Department, Meander Medical Center, Maatweg 3, Amersfoort, 3813 TZ, Utrecht, The Netherlands. bga.gerats@meandermc.nl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2570-1834
Jelmer M WolterinkDepartment of Applied Mathematics & Technical Medical Center, University of Twente, Drienerlolaan 5, Enschede, 7522 NB, Overijssel, The Netherlands.
Ivo A M J BroedersSurgery Department, Meander Medical Center, Maatweg 3, Amersfoort, 3813 TZ, Utrecht, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEfficient operating room (OR) workflows have the potential to reduce delays and cancellations, shorten patient waiting lists, and improve satisfaction among patients and staff. Insights for OR efficiency can be extracted from the registration and timing of workflow steps. However, manual registration of these steps is often unreliable. Therefore, we propose to recognize the OR workflow automatically in videos from overhead depth cameras using deep learning. In contrast to regular cameras, depth cameras do not capture fine video details that permit identification of the people recorded. Hence, the privacy of patients and staff is preserved.

methodsWe gathered a video dataset of 21 laparoscopic surgeries captured by three depth cameras positioned in different corners of the OR. The procedures were annotated with four phases describing the OR workflow, i.e., turnover, anesthesia, surgery, and wrap-up. We performed an extensive analysis with spatial and temporal deep learning models, including a comparison between multi- and single-view camera setups, and contrasting post-operative with real-time predictions. Along with standard metrics for workflow recognition, we introduce a new evaluation metric that reflects the error in estimated phase duration.

resultsThe best-performing model, ASFormer, recognized operative phases with 99.7% mean average precision (mAP), enabling the estimation of phase duration with a mean absolute error of 35 seconds. The best-performing spatial model resulted in 89.7% mAP, indicating the importance of temporal modeling. We also found that the three cameras could be replaced by a single camera, with 98.8% mAP, although performance depends on the camera location in the OR. Additionally, we found that real-time prediction is feasible but underperforms with respect to post-operative analysis (94.3% mAP).

conclusionsAutomated OR workflow recognition is possible using existing deep learning techniques based on single- and multi-camera setups. The use of privacy-preserving depth videos and a reasonably low phase duration estimation error could have positive implications for practical use.

Indexed as

Deep LearningLaparoscopyOperating RoomsPrivacyVideo RecordingWorkflowHumansDepth videosOperating room efficiencySurgical workflow recognition

Identifiers

PMID40770511
PMCPMC12408783

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.