ReviewAesthetic plastic surgery2025
Laser-Assisted Lipolysis: A Promising Alternative to Traditional Liposuction.
Review in Aesthetic plastic surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- A Zone-Specific, Minimally Invasive Approach with a Rotary Cutting System for Moderate-to-Severe Fibrotic Buffalo Hump.Aesthetic plastic surgery · 2026Article
- Article
- Evaluation of the Efficacy and Patient Satisfaction of Endoscope-Assisted High-Speed Rotary Cutter for Nuchal Fat Pad Removal.Clinical, cosmetic and investigational dermatology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundLaser-Assisted Lipolysis (LAL) has emerged as a modern advancement in body contouring, offering solutions to limitations of traditional liposuction such as prolonged recovery, increased bruising, and limited skin-tightening effects. By using targeted laser energy to liquefy fat before removal, LAL minimizes tissue trauma, enhances skin retraction, and improves overall aesthetic outcomes.
objectiveTo provide a comprehensive review of the historical evolution, current technological advances, comparative methodologies, limitations, and future directions of LAL in cosmetic surgery.
methodsA narrative literature review was conducted, incorporating peer-reviewed articles, FDA-cleared devices, and clinical studies. Topics included the historical progression of LAL since its inception in the late 1990s, comparative analyses between LAL and traditional techniques, evaluation of laser wavelengths (e.g., 1064, 1320, 1444, and 1470 nm), and examination of innovations such as dual-wavelength systems, robotic-assisted delivery, AI-guided planning, and radiofrequency-assisted methods.
resultsLAL shows clinical advantages including faster recovery times, reduced postoperative pain, and improved skin tightening, especially in small to moderate fat reduction areas. Dual- and multi-wavelength lasers, pulse modulation, and fiber-optic temperature sensing improve precision and safety. Comparative studies show LAL achieves better outcomes than traditional liposuction in certain contexts, particularly for skin appearance and submental fat reduction. However, variability in laser parameters, higher procedural costs, and limitations in autologous fat reuse remain concerns. Research also highlights promising applications of LAL in large-volume fat removal and potential bariatric contexts.
conclusionLAL has evolved into a valuable technique in modern aesthetic surgery. While not a replacement for traditional liposuction in all cases, it offers meaningful benefits as a stand-alone or adjunct procedure. Continued innovations, such as nanotechnology, biodegradable fibers, and AI-assisted planning, may further enhance its effectiveness, precision, and personalization in future body contouring practices. Level of Evidence V This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.