ArticleNPJ digital medicine2025
Evaluation of the NHS active 10 walking app intervention through time-series analysis in 201,688 individuals.
Article in NPJ digital medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Despite widespread interest in integrating mobile health apps into primary care to prevent and manage physical inactivity-related health conditions, the effectiveness of these apps remains unclear. We quantified the effects of Active 10 (a goal setting and self-monitoring app developed by Public Health England) on brisk and non-brisk walking using a single-group interrupted time-series analysis of individual-level data collected between July 2021 and January 2024. Among Active 10 users (n = 201,668 l; 51.4 ± 14.4 years; 75.4% women) brisk and non-brisk walking increased by 9.0 (95% confidence interval (CI) 8.9, 9.1; 73% above baseline) and 2.6 min/day (95% CI 2.4, 2.8; 9% above baseline), respectively, on the day of app download. Post-download, brisk and non-brisk walking decreased by 0.15 (95% CI -0.17, -0.13) and 0.06 (95% CI -0.08, -0.03) min/day/month, respectively, but remained above baseline. Our findings suggest that Active 10 may be effective in facilitating increases in brisk and non-brisk walking.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.