ReviewCurrent topics in medicinal chemistry2026
Natural Oil and Polycystic Ovary Syndrome: A Comprehensive Review of Therapeutic Benefits.
Review in Current topics in medicinal chemistry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionPolycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) is a common endocrine and metabolic disorder affecting 70-75% of women. This condition is frequently linked with large and dysfunctional ovaries, high levels of androgens, and insulin resistance. A variety of conventional treatments, including metformin, oral contraceptives, and anti-androgen agents, have been used to treat PCOS and its complications, but they have been linked to several negative side effects, including hyperkalemia, weight gain, cardiovascular and hepatic toxicity, vitamin B12 and folic acid deficiency. As a result, there is growing interest in natural methods as complementary or alternative approaches to mitigate these side effects. According to several studies, traditionally used Natural oils (NOs) from various sources have been utilized to identify their ameliorating characteristics against PCOS. The paper aims to study pre-clinical investigations and clinical studies of NOs from different sources against PCOS and gives a comprehensive overview of controlling PCOS. Also, it highlights and tabulates the prominent bioactive phytoconstituents from the reported NOs and their mechanism of action.
methodsFor this review purpose, the authors have gone through a vast number of scientific literature from different scientific databases like Google Scholar, ScienceDirect, Web of Science, and PubMed.
resultsMentha spicata L., Foeniculum vulgare Mill., Linum usitatissimum L., Nigella sativa L., Bambusa bambos (L.) Voss, Thuja occidentalis L., Syzygium aromaticum L., Pimpinella anisum L., Rosa canina L., Cocos nucifera L., Oenothera biennis L., Corylus avellana L., and fish oil have been reported to have anti-PCOS activity by maintaining body weight, testosterone, LH, FSH levels, and improving ovarian cysts. DISCUSSION: NOs derived from plant and animal sources show promise in treating PCOS by balancing hormone levels, enhancing ovarian morphology, and alleviating metabolic symptoms. However, significant clinical trials and molecular research are required to evaluate their therapeutic potential, identify suitable dosages, investigate their precise mechanisms of action, and ensure long-term safety and efficacy in PCOS management.
conclusionFurther research is needed to understand the molecular mechanisms of NOs responsible for anti-PCOS activity. Studies are needed to concentrate on their mechanisms of action, routes of impact, safe dosage, and potential side effects to ensure their efficacy and safety in treating PCOS.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40770474What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.