ArticleJournal of Korean Neurosurgical Society2025
Association between Neutrophil-to-Albumin Ratio and 28-Day All-Cause Mortality in Patients with Traumatic Brain Injury : A Retrospective Analysis of the MIMIC-IV Database.
Article in Journal of Korean Neurosurgical Society, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Albumin-Anchored Thromboinflammatory Ratios Provide Modest Incremental Prognostic Value Beyond Clinical Severity Scores in Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage: A Retrospective Study.Neurocritical care · 2026Article
- Tenascin-C, presepsin (SCD14-ST), and neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio as complementary circulating biomarkers for sepsis-associated organ dysfunction and 28-day all-cause mortality: A biomarker-enriched prognostic model.Journal of medical biochemistry · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThe neutrophil-to-albumin ratio (NAR) has emerged as a novel prognostic biomarker in multiple disease contexts, including infectious and cardiovascular disorders. Its prognostic relevance in traumatic brain injury (TBI), however, remains unexamined. This study investigates the association between NAR and 28-day all-cause mortality in patients with TBI.
methodsThis retrospective study analyzed data from the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care IV database. Neutrophil counts, serum albumin concentrations, and NAR values were recorded within the first 24 hours following TBI admission. Additional clinical and laboratory parameters were collected. The Youden index was employed to determine the optimal NAR threshold. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was used to assess the discriminative capacity of NAR for all-cause mortality. Subgroup analyses were conducted to evaluate potential heterogeneity in NAR's prognostic utility across distinct patient subsets. An external validation cohort comprising 112 TBI cases from the institutional database was included to confirm predictive performance. Kaplan-Meier survival analyses were used to compare outcomes between high- and low-NAR groups, while ROC analysis was performed across the entire TBI cohort to assess overall prognostic accuracy.
resultsA total of 213 TBI patients were included and stratified based on 28-day survival status : 180 survivors and 33 non-survivors, resulting in an overall mortality rate of 15.5%. Multivariate Cox regression identified NAR as an independent predictor of 28-day all-cause mortality (hazard ratio [HR], 3.224; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.321-4.594; p<0.001). ROC curve analysis determined an optimal NAR cutoff of 1.2839 for discriminating between survivors and non-survivors. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis revealed significantly elevated mortality among patients with NAR ≥1.2839 compared to those with NAR <1.2839 (log-rank p<0.001). The area under the curve (AUC) for NAR reached 82.45% (95% CI, 67.02-87.50%), surpassing the predictive performance of neutrophil count (AUC, 60.27%) and serum albumin level (AUC, 60.91%) when assessed individually. Subgroup analyses showed no significant interaction effects (p for interaction, 0.302-0.908), indicating consistent predictive performance across patient subgroups. External validation reinforced the prognostic value of NAR : patients in the high-NAR group demonstrated significantly worse survival outcomes (HR, 3.611; 95% CI, 1.385-9.419; p<0.01), with comparable discriminatory accuracy (AUC, 82.91%; 95% CI, 65.13-89.59%).
conclusionNAR functions as an independent and robust prognostic indicator of 28-day all-cause mortality in patients with TBI. Compared to neutrophil count and serum albumin levels alone, NAR demonstrates superior predictive accuracy and may serve as a valuable biomarker for early mortality risk stratification in this population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.