ArticleMolecular psychiatry2025
Genomic risk prediction for depression in a large prospective study of older adults of European descent.
Article in Molecular psychiatry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Prevalence and Predictors of Depressive Symptom Trajectories in Older Adults: A Systematic Review.Brain and behavior · 2026Pooled it
- Next-generation precision medicine for mood disorders: reproducible blood biomarkers enable objective diagnostics, subtyping, and targeted therapeutics.Molecular psychiatry · 2026Article
- Diet quality and depressive symptoms in older adults, assessing the effect modification by genetic predisposition and low-grade inflammation: a target trial emulation.Molecular psychiatry · 2026Article
- Multidimensional determinants of depression and non-depression in older adults: evidence from national data.BMC geriatrics · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The extent to which genetic predisposition contributes to late-life depression risk, particularly after age 70, remains unclear, despite the high prevalence of depression in this age group and the variability in risk factors by age. This study investigated the association between a polygenic score (PGS) and depression outcomes, including severity, trajectories of depression, and antidepressant medication use, in a longitudinal cohort of 12,029 genotyped older adults of European descent aged ≥70 years, with no history of diagnosed cardiovascular disease events, dementia, or permanent physical disability at baseline. Participants were followed for a median of 4.7 years. The PGS was derived using the latest Psychiatric Genomics Consortium data for major depression. Depression was defined by the CES-D-10 score thresholds of ≥8 (primary outcome), ≥10, and ≥12 (secondary outcomes), alongside antidepressant medication use and four previously established longitudinal trajectories of depressive symptoms: low (non-depressed), moderate (subthreshold), high (persistent), and initially low but increasing (emerging). Multivariable models were used to examine associations between the PGS (per standard deviation, SD) and outcomes, adjusting for covariates. At baseline, mean participant age was 75.1 years, 54.9% were female, and 9.1% had depression (CES-D-10 ≥ 8). The PGS was significantly associated with baseline depression (OR = 1.23 [1.15-1.31]), incident depression (HR = 1.18 [1.14-1.23]) and antidepressant medication use (OR = 1.39 [1.31-1.47]). Compared with non-depressed participants, the PGS was associated with increasing severity of depression trajectory classes (subthreshold depression OR = 1.15 [1.11-1.20], emerging depression OR = 1.22 [1.13-1.31], persistent depression OR = 1.40 [1.31-1.49]). These findings suggest that the PGS may play an important role in risk stratification for late-life depression.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.