Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40770422›Full record

ArticleJournal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association2026

Staff perspectives on racial inequities in the neonatal intensive care unit: the REJOICE study.

Krystal Austin, Olga Smith, Monica McLemore, Sarah Lewis, Safyer McKenzie-Sampson, Taylor E Washington, Elizabeth E Rogers, Kayla L Karvonen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Krystal AustinUniversity of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, USA. krystal.austin@cuanschutz.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7746-6293
Olga SmithIndependent Researcher, Antioch, CA, USA.
Monica McLemoreDepartment of Child, Family, and Population Health Nursing, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Sarah LewisCollege of Pharmacy, Touro University, Vallejo, CA, USA.
Safyer McKenzie-SampsonDepartment of Pediatrics, Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3924-9634
Taylor E WashingtonUniversity of Virginia School of Medicine, Charlottesville, VA, USA.
Elizabeth E RogersDepartment of Pediatrics, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Kayla L KarvonenDepartment of Pediatrics, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8213-6697

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo understand staff perspectives on racism experienced by both parents and staff members in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU). STUDY

designOpen-ended surveys and semi-structured interviews were conducted with staff at an urban level IV NICU from 2021 to 2022. Themes were generated and refined using thematic analysis. The main outcome constituted participants' experiences of structural racism.

results72 multi-disciplinary and racially and ethnically diverse participants completed the survey and 10 participants were also interviewed. Five major themes were identified: (1) a wide range of denial and recognition of racism existed, (2) workplace culture and relationships both protected against and facilitated racism, (3) staff experienced a lack of workforce diversity and minority tax, and witnessed (4) biased communication and language barriers, and (5) disparate resource allocation.

conclusionsSimilar to other healthcare worker and caregiver reports, NICU staff members also experience and witness interpersonal, institutional, and structural forms of racism.

Indexed as

Attitude of Health PersonnelHealthcare DisparitiesIntensive Care Units, NeonatalRacismAdultFemaleHumansInfant, NewbornInterviews as TopicMaleOrganizational CultureQualitative ResearchSurveys and Questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID40770422
PMCPMC12909122

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.