ArticleScientific reports2025
Balancing mental health through predictive modeling for healthcare workers during public health crises.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Machine learning in the analysis of mental health at work: a scoping review.Journal of occupational health · 2026Article
- Article
- A dialectical lens for AI and medical humanities: advancing responsible augmented humanism in Digital Public Health.Frontiers in public health · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
During public health emergencies such as SARS, Ebola, and COVID-19, healthcare workers (HCWs) are often on the front lines, placing them at increased risk for adverse mental health outcomes, particularly depression and anxiety. Despite this risk, there remains a scarcity of research focused on developing predictive models to forecast the depression and anxiety levels of healthcare workers under challenging conditions. A total of 349 HCWs were selected from a Tertiary Grade-A hospital in the city of Shenyang, Liaoning Province in China. Depression and anxiety were assessed using the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9) and the Generalized Anxiety Disorder (GAD-7) scale, respectively. This study employed a random forest classifier (RFC) to predict depression and anxiety levels of HCWs from three perspectives: individual, interpersonal, and institutional with SHAP values to assess the contribution of factors. The Synthetic Minority Over-sampling Technique (SMOTE) was employed to address the issue of imbalanced data distribution. The prevalence of depression and anxiety among HCWs was 28.37% and 33.52%, respectively. The prediction model was developed using a training dataset (70%) and a test dataset (30%). The area under the curve (AUC) for depression and anxiety was 0.88 and 0.72, respectively. Additionally, the mean values of the 10-fold cross-validation results were 0.77 for the depression prediction model and 0.79 for the anxiety prediction model. For the depression prediction model, the top ten most significant predictive factors were: burnout, resilience, emotional labor, adaptability, working experience (< 1 year), being a physician, social support, average work time last week (9-11 h), age (28-30 years), age (31-35 years). For the anxiety prediction model, the top ten most significant predictive factors were: burnout, adaptability, emotional labor, age (31-35 years), average work time last week (9-11 h), resilience, being a physician, social support, working experience (< 1 year), and being female. It is essential to develop interventions that provide support both before and after a public health emergency, aiming at mitigating symptoms of depression and anxiety. The machine learning models in this study, using innovative SMOTE methodology to balance datasets with smaller sample sizes, identified key leverage points to prevent depression and anxiety among frontline HCWs, including mitigating burnout among HCWs, bolstering their resilience and adaptability, and ensuring reasonable work hours.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.