ArticleJournal of eating disorders2025
Psychological distance affects real movements in virtual reality: distance to food in anorexia nervosa.
Article in Journal of eating disorders, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPatients with restrictive Anorexia Nervosa (AN-R) severely restrict their food intake, often showing significant food avoidance behavior, especially for diet-goal threatening and high-calorie foods. Still, stringent comparisons of avoidance behaviors in relation to calorie dense foods, low-calorie food and abstract (amodal) food cues are required to better understand the underlying mechanisms.
methodsApproach-avoidance behavior was measured in individuals with AN-R (n = 21) and Healthy Controls (HC; n = 19) using a virtual reality stop-signal task. In a virtual environment, participants had to reach a digitally rendered hand toward low-calorie, high-calorie and amodal (packaged) food cues, as well as nonfood cues (shoes). If a stop-sign appeared, they had to inhibit this movement (stop-trials). They also rated how much they liked and wanted each stimulus on a visual analog scale from 0 to 100.
resultsParticipants showed more approach behavior towards amodal food cues compared to high-calorie concrete food cues (t[39] = 25.38, p <.001, d = 4.01). Furthermore, patients with AN-R reported lower wanting for high-calorie foods (t[37] = 2.13, p =.040, d = 2.13) and greater wanting for nonfood cues (t[37] = -3.35, p =.002, d = 3.35). Across groups, liking was highest for high-calorie food, both packaged (t[39] = 4.03, p =.002, d = 0.40) and unpackaged (t[39] = 3.53, p =.007, d = 0.36).
conclusionsFood presentation can influence approach behavior toward food cues. Future research is needed to determine whether the use of abstract food cues can facilitate food approach behavior in individuals with AN-R.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.