Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40770376›Full record

ArticleBMC psychology2025

Economic insecurity increases high earners' preference for risk.

Xiaoyan Wang, Lina Wang, Rong Huang, Yanping Qin, Ying Guo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC psychology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Xiaoyan Wang *College of Psychology, Sichuan Normal University, Chengdu, China.
Lina Wang *College of Psychology, Sichuan Normal University, Chengdu, China.
Rong HuangCollege of Psychology, Sichuan Normal University, Chengdu, China.
Yanping QinCollege of Psychology, Sichuan Normal University, Chengdu, China.
Ying GuoCollege of Psychology, Sichuan Normal University, Chengdu, China. guoying517@163.com.

Funding

Sichuan Normal University 22XW080
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study examines how economic insecurity and income level influence individuals' preferences for risk in decision-making. Economic insecurity was experimentally manipulated in a laboratory setting, and participants' risk preference was subsequently assessed using the Balloon Analogue Risk Task (BART). Participants completed the BART under either a gain frame, where inflating a virtual balloon increased potential monetary gains (Experiment 1), or a loss frame, where ballon inflation was necessary to avoid monetary loss (Experiment 2). Results showed that, in both gain and loss contexts, high-income individuals experiencing greater economic insecurity exhibited a higher preference for risk compared to those with lower economic insecurity, whereas no difference in risk preference was observed among low-income individuals (Experiment 1 and 2). Additionally, in the loss context, high-income participants manifested a greater preference for risk than low-income participants. Overall, the findings suggest that economic insecurity heightens risk preference among high earners.

Indexed as

Choice BehaviorDecision MakingIncomeRisk-TakingAdultFemaleHumansMaleYoung AdultDecision-makingEconomic insecurityGain-loss frameworkIncomeRisk preference

Identifiers

PMID40770376
PMCPMC12329952

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.