ArticleThyroid research2025
Urine iodine concentration in hospitalised infants with thyroid dysfunction.
Article in Thyroid research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundIodine is essential to thyroid hormone production, and both excess and deficiency can cause thyroid dysfunction in infants. While urinary iodine concentration (UIC) is used to assess population iodine status, there is no gold standard for determining iodine status in individual infants. Our study aimed to examine the clinical use of UIC in the investigation of thyroid dysfunction in hospitalised infants.
methodsWe examined hospital records of infants (age < 24 months) admitted to The Children's Hospital at Westmead who had UIC collected in the context of thyroid dysfunction between 2007-2009 and 2017-2021, two time periods separated by changes in public health measures for iodine nutrition and local clinical practice.
resultsOf 152 infants, 13.8% had UIC in iodine deficient range (WHO population-based definition: UIC < 100 µg/L) and 53.9% in iodine excess range (UIC ≥ 300 µg/L). Highest quartile UIC (> 1432 µg/L) was significantly associated with pre-test clinician suspicion of iodine excess, identification of source of iodine exposure, higher percentage of premature babies, and those with cardiac anomalies or who required surgery. Median free thyroxine (fT4) level was significantly lower in the highest UIC quartile group compared to the lower three quartiles (9.4pmol/L [interquartile range 7.8-vs 13.7] vs. 12.7 pmol/L [10.3-15.6]; p = 0.004). While median TSH was elevated in all UIC quartiles in this group, there were no significant differences in the levels between the UIC quartile groups.
conclusionsExtremely high random UIC can be helpful to confirm clinical suspicion of iodine excess in hospital-based infants, taken in the context of thyroid dysfunction in critical illness. The degree of thyroid dysfunction associated with high UIC in this clinically complex and often premature patient population may be better measured by the fT4 level rather than the degree of TSH elevation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.