ArticleTrials2025
Reducing intraoperative hemorrhage in type II caesarean scar pregnancy: a study protocol comparing high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) pretreatment vs. hysteroscopy-guided suction curettage-an open-label, 1:1 parallel-group, superiority-design investigator-initiated trial (IIT).
Article in Trials, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe incidence of caesarean scar pregnancy (CSP) has significantly increased due to the increasing prevalence of caesarean deliveries and advances in diagnostic imaging. However, no consensus has yet been reached on the optimal therapeutic approach. Type II CSP leads to disease heterogeneity, characterized by multiple treatment options and the absence of a unified therapeutic approach. Hysteroscopic treatment for CSP has demonstrated a notable success rate, particularly in cases of type I CSP. High-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) ablation has emerged as a novel, non-invasive treatment option that minimizes intraoperative blood loss. However, its use may be excessive in low-risk cases. Here, we report a protocol for a randomized clinical trial designed to evaluate the necessity of performing HIFU in CSP treatment when combined with suction curettage under hysteroscopic guidance.
methodsWe aim to propose a randomized clinical trial that will enroll 140 participants. All participants will undergo surgical suction curettage guided by hysteroscopy, randomized into groups with or without HIFU pretreatment. Data on demographic characteristics, disease characteristics, ultrasound findings, and laboratory test results will be collected before the intervention. The primary outcome will be the intraoperative blood loss. Secondary outcomes will include the incidence of near haemorrhage, therapeutic success rates, and subsequent pregnancy outcomes within a 2-year follow-up period. DISCUSSION: Hysteroscopy has exhibited favourable therapeutic outcomes in the management of CSP, though it remains associated with a risk of intraoperative haemorrhage. HIFU has shown promise as a preoperative adjuvant modality. However, the comparative clinical advantages of standalone hysteroscopic intervention versus HIFU-assisted protocols are insufficiently explored in prospective clinical studies. This investigation seeks to assess both the standalone efficacy of hysteroscopic resection and the efficacy of combined therapy incorporating HIFU pretreatment for type II CSP.
trial registrationRegistration number: ChiCTR2000034332. Registration date: 2nd July 2020.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.