ArticleBMC public health2025
The prevalence of computer vision syndrome and associated factors among university students in oman: a cross-sectional study.
Article in BMC public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Oculomotor Vergence Eye Movement Endurance in Normal Vision via Virtual Reality-Integrated Eye Tracking.Journal of eye movement research · 2026Article
- Sports vision training reduces digital eye strain in screen-exposed university students: a randomized controlled trial of visuomotor and visual-attentional adaptation.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2026Article
- Digital Eye Strain and Perceived Academic Burden Among Syrian Medical Students: A Multicenter Cross-Sectional Study of Symptom Burden and Associated Factors.Advances in medical education and practice · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundComputer Vision Syndrome (CVS) is among the most significant occupational risks of the 21st century, which impacts 70% of all computer users. The study is conducted in Oman to investigate the prevalence of CVS and the associated factors among university students.
methodsThis cross-sectional study included 293 undergraduate students from nine colleges and used an online self-administered questionnaire.
resultsThe prevalence of CVS among the participants was 73.7%. The most reported extraocular eye symptoms were headache (52.4%) and eye strain and fatigue (45.7%). The results showed that students with uncomfortable seating postures and close-eye screen distance were twice as likely to develop CVS. Students who do not feel that digital technology affects their lifestyle and eye health and do not have a refractive error or wear glasses were less likely to develop CVS. The odds of CVS being present were less likely when consuming most of the screen time in social entertainment than when using the screen for university study.
conclusionThis study found a high prevalence of computer vision syndrome that was significantly associated with uncomfortable seating posture, short screen distance, having no refractive errors, perception of minimal impact of digital technology on lifestyle, and using screens for entertainment. The study emphasized the necessity of considering the high prevalence of CVS and associated factors among university students. Therefore, academic institutions must implement comprehensive ergonomic strategies and healthy visual habits to avoid the occurrence of CVS.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.