ArticleBMC geriatrics2025
Investigating older people's preferences for an urgent care service: a discrete choice experiment.
Article in BMC geriatrics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Preferences for rapid implementation science: a real-time discrete choice experiment.Implementation science communications · 2026Article
- Preferences for hospital in the home for COVID-19: a discrete choice experiment study.Health economics review · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundEmergency and urgent care, where patients perceive the need for immediate access to medical advice or treatment, comprises a large and significant component of health care delivery. Older people are over-represented in Emergency Departments (ED) and over 55% are likely to be hospitalised with extended lengths of stay. To date, little research has been conducted to assess the needs and preferences of older people concerning alternative models of urgent care. The purpose of this study was to identify older people’s preferences for key characteristics of an urgent care service as an alternative to ED presentation using discrete choice experiment methods.
methodsAttributes and levels for the Discrete Choice Experiment (DCE) were informed by older people and health care professionals with recent ED experience. Attributes included waiting time for ED admission, knowledge and training of medical professionals, the extent to which the older person is treated holistically, how the physical environment is designed to best support older people, and the level of follow-up care received. The DCE was embedded within a larger survey to assess older people’s (aged >65 years) views and preferences for alternative models of emergency and urgent care. Data were analysed using conditional and mixed logit regressions.
resultsOverall, 995 older people consented to participate and fully completed the DCE. Respondents attached the strongest relative importance to an urgent care service with reduced waiting times (within 2 hours of making the triple zero call), followed by medical professionals with specialist training in the care of older people, holistic support and regular communication updates, physical environment to support older people, and a comprehensive discharge summary and follow up. All of these attribute levels were highly statistically significant (p<0.001) in influencing preferences for the total sample and by subgroups reflecting key socio-demographic characteristics and emergency care experience.
conclusionsThis study has identified older people’s preferences for key characteristics of an urgent care service as an alternative to ED presentation. The findings will inform policymakers and practitioners in the design and configuratiCon of an optimal urgent care service model from the perspective of older people.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.