Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40770279›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Trait emotion regulation similarity and well-being.

Lameese Eldesouky, James J Gross, Tammy English

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Lameese EldesoukyDepartment of Psychology, The American University in Cairo, New Cairo, Egypt. lameese.eldesouky@aucegypt.edu.
James J GrossDepartment of Psychology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.
Tammy EnglishDepartment of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, USA.

Funding

Emotion Regulation and Its ConsequencesR01MH058147 · NIMH · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI GROSS, JAMES J · 2003 to 2007
$2.4M
NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH058147U.S. Department of Health & Human Services | NIH | National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH) R01 MH58147
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The ways people manage their emotions (emotion regulation; ER) have been found to affect their own well-being and the well-being of others. In the present research, we extended prior work by examining whether similarity between people's ER habits is also associated with well-being. The study consisted of 254 American romantic couples (N = 508) who completed self-report measures of habitual, or trait-level, use of a wide range of ER strategies (when regulating positive emotions and negative emotions), as well as psychological well-being and relational well-being indices. Contrary to our hypothesis, similarity in trait ER was not associated with any well-being index. This was the case across all ER strategies and the results converged across analyses that used three different metrics of similarity (difference scores, profile correlations, actor x partner interaction). The results suggest that although one's own ER, and their romantic partner's ER, may be tied to well-being, similarity between romantic partners' ER habits may not matter as much.

Indexed as

Emotional RegulationEmotionsSexual PartnersAdultFemaleHumansInterpersonal RelationsMaleMiddle AgedPersonal SatisfactionSelf ReportYoung AdultEmotion regulationPersonalityRomantic relationshipsSimilarityWell-being

Identifiers

PMID40770279
PMCPMC12328644

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.