ArticleScientific reports2025
3D reconstruction from 2D multi-view dental 2D images based on EfficientNetB0 model.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- 3D reconstruction of the target tooth occlusal surface from a single-view image for root canal surgical navigation.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2026Article
- 2D-to-3D Image Reconstruction in Agriculture: A Review of Methods, Challenges, and AI-Driven Opportunities.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Dental diseases are the primary cause of oral health concerns around the world, affecting millions of people. Therefore, recent developments in imaging technologies have transformed the detection and treatment of oral problems. Applying three-dimensional (3D) reconstruction from two-dimensional (2D) dental images, such as X-rays, is a potential development field. 3D reconstruction technology converts real-world goals into mathematical models that are compatible with computer logic expressions. It's been commonly used in dentistry. Particularly for patients with a vomiting reflex, 3D imaging techniques minimize patient discomfort and shorten the length of the examination or treatment. Therefore, this research paper proposes a new 3D reconstruction model from 2D multi-view dental images. The proposed framework consists of three stages. The first stage is the encoder stage, which extracts meaningful features from the 2D images. The second stage captures spatial and semantic information essential for the reconstruction task. The third stage is recurrence, which uses 3D long short-term memory (LSTM). It ensures that the information from various viewpoints is effectively integrated to produce a coherent representation of the 3D structure and decoder stage to translate the aggregated features from the LSTM into a fully reconstructed 3D model. When the proposed model was tested on the ShapeNet dataset, the suggested model achieved a maximum intersection over union (IoU) of 89.98% and an F1_score of 94.11%. A special case of 3D reconstruction, a dental dataset, has been created with the same structure as the ShapeNet dataset to evaluate our system. The proposed approach's results show promising accomplishments compared to many state-of-the-art approaches, and they motivate the authors to make plans for further improvement.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.