Trial reportScientific reports2025
Evaluate the clinical performance of Bio-HPP and Vitallium frameworks in free-end removable partial dentures.
Trial report in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Denture defects affect patients' aesthetic appearance and masticatory function, thus reducing their quality of life. There are many ways to repair denture defects, among which removable partial dentures are a basic and widely used method. The purpose of this study was to compare the clinical performance of Bio-HPP and Vitallium frameworks in the restoration of free-end removable partial dentures. 80 patients with free-end removable partial dentures treated at the Stomatology Hospital of Xi'an jiaotong university from January 2022 to March 2023 were randomly divided into two groups. 40 patients in the control group received Vitallium frameworks and 40 patients in the observation group received Bio-HPP frameworks. The abutment tooth mobility, gingival index, and patient satisfaction after one year of restoration were compared and analyzed between the two groups using an Independent T-test. P < 0.05 was considered significant. All our experiments were carried out in accordance with relevant standards and regulations of Stomatology Hospital of Xi 'an Jiaotong University. After 1-year follow-up, in terms of aesthetics, comfort, and patient satisfaction, Bio-HPP was significantly superior to Vitallium frameworks, whereas the opposite was true for denture stability (P < 0.05). Besides, there were no significant differences in the mobility of abutment teeth and gingival index between Bio-HPP and Vitallium frameworks (P > 0.05). Both Bio-HPP and Vitallium frameworks can be used in restoring free-end removable partial dentures and the performance of the restorations was clinically acceptable. However, Bio-HPP has unique advantages in terms of aesthetics and comfort.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.