ArticleScientific reports2025
Thermal, hardness, and tribological assessment of PEEK/CoCr composites.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Influence of Graphite, Boron, Zirconium, and Hydroxyapatite Reinforcements on the Mechanostructure of Polyaryletheretherketone-Matrix Hybrid Composites.Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Enhanced crystallinity, hardness and thermal stability of PEEK/TC4 composites for biomedical applications.Scientific reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Poly(ether-ether-ketone) (PEEK) is a high-performance thermoplastic with excellent mechanical strength, thermal stability, and chemical resistance, making it attractive for applications like biomedical implants and prostheses. However, neat PEEK suffers from a high friction coefficient and pronounced wear in sliding contacts. In this work, composites of PEEK with Cobalt-Chromium (CoCr) alloy powder were fabricated by centrifugal powder compaction and vacuum sintering. Four composite compositions, with weight percentages of 10%, 20%, 30%, and 40% of CoCr, were produced. Scanning electron microscopy analysis confirmed uniform dispersion of CoCr particles within the PEEK matrix. Differential scanning calorimetry and thermogravimetric analysis showed that CoCr addition did not significantly alter PEEK's melting temperature or thermal stability. Microhardness increased with filler loading, with the 40% CoCr composite achieving a 40% hardness improvement over neat PEEK. Ball-on-disk tests against steel revealed that all composites exhibited significantly reduced wear loss by 84% compared to neat PEEK, while maintaining a friction coefficient typical for PEEK-steel contacts. Overall, the PEEK/CoCr composites demonstrate enhanced hardness and wear resistance while retaining PEEK's favorable thermal properties, suggesting their potential for applications requiring better tribological performance than unfilled PEEK.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.