Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40770244›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Development of a deep learning based approach for multi-material decomposition in spectral CT: a proof of principle in silico study.

Jayasai R Rajagopal, Saikiran Rapaka, Faraz Farhadi, Ehsan Abadi, W Paul Segars, Tristan Nowak, Puneet Sharma, William F Pritchard, Ashkan Malayeri, Elizabeth C Jones and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. K-Edge imaging using a clinical dual-source photon-counting CT system.Journal of applied clinical medical physics · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Jayasai R RajagopalCarl E. Ravin Advanced Imaging Laboratories and Center for Virtual Imaging Trials, Department of Radiology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, 27705, USA. jayasai.rajagopal@duke.edu.
Saikiran RapakaSiemens Healthineers, Princeton, NJ, 08540, USA.
Faraz FarhadiRadiology and Imaging Sciences, National Institutes of Health Clinical Center, Bethesda, MD, 20892, USA.
Ehsan AbadiCarl E. Ravin Advanced Imaging Laboratories and Center for Virtual Imaging Trials, Department of Radiology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, 27705, USA.
W Paul SegarsCarl E. Ravin Advanced Imaging Laboratories and Center for Virtual Imaging Trials, Department of Radiology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, 27705, USA.
Tristan NowakSiemens Healthineers AG, Siemensstr. 3, 91301, Forchheim, Germany.
Puneet SharmaSiemens Healthineers, Princeton, NJ, 08540, USA.
William F PritchardRadiology and Imaging Sciences, National Institutes of Health Clinical Center, Bethesda, MD, 20892, USA.
Ashkan MalayeriRadiology and Imaging Sciences, National Institutes of Health Clinical Center, Bethesda, MD, 20892, USA.
Elizabeth C JonesRadiology and Imaging Sciences, National Institutes of Health Clinical Center, Bethesda, MD, 20892, USA. ejones@cc.nih.gov.
Ehsan SameiCarl E. Ravin Advanced Imaging Laboratories and Center for Virtual Imaging Trials, Department of Radiology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, 27705, USA.
Pooyan SahbaeeSiemens Healthineers, 19335, Malvern, PA, USA. pooyan.sahbaee@siemens-healthineers.com.

Funding

TR&D Project 3: Virtual ReadersP41EB028744 · NIBIB · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI Ehsan Samei · 2021 to 2026
$7.8M
Simulation Tools for Dynamic CTR01EB001838 · NIBIB · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI SAMEI, EHSAN, SEGARS, WILLIAM P · 2005 to 2023
$6.9M
NIBIB NIH HHS P41 EB028744NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB001838
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Conventional approaches to material decomposition in spectral CT face challenges related to precise algorithm calibration across imaged conditions and low signal quality caused by variable object size and reduced dose. In this proof-of-principle study, a deep learning approach to multi-material decomposition was developed to quantify iodine, gadolinium, and calcium in spectral CT. A dual-phase network architecture was trained using synthetic datasets containing computational models of cylindrical and virtual patient phantoms. Classification and quantification performance was evaluated across a range of patient size and dose parameters. The model was found to accurately classify (accuracy: cylinders - 98%, virtual patients - 97%) and quantify materials (mean absolute percentage difference: cylinders - 8-10%, virtual patients - 10-15%) in both datasets. Performance in virtual patient phantoms improved as the hybrid training dataset included a larger contingent of virtual patient phantoms (accuracy: 48% with 0 virtual patients to 97% with 8 virtual patients). For both datasets, the algorithm was able to maintain strong performance under challenging conditions of large patient size and reduced dose. This study shows the validity of a deep-learning based approach to multi-material decomposition trained with in-silico images that can overcome the limitations of conventional material decomposition approaches.

Indexed as

Deep LearningImage Processing, Computer-AssistedTomography, X-Ray ComputedAlgorithmsCalciumComputer SimulationGadoliniumHumansIodinePhantoms, ImagingCalciumGadoliniumIodineComputed tomographyDeep learningMaterial decompositionSimulationSpectral CT

Identifiers

PMID40770244
PMCPMC12329014

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.