ArticleScientific reports2025
Revolutionizing clinical decision making through deep learning and topic modeling for pathway optimization.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- A Systematic Review of Topic Modeling Techniques for Electronic Health Records.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Optimizing clinical pathways is pivotal for enhancing healthcare delivery, yet traditional methods are increasingly insufficient in the face of complex, personalized medical demands. This paper introduces an innovative optimization framework that fuses Latent Dirichlet Allocation (LDA) topic modeling with Bidirectional Long Short-Term Memory (BiLSTM) networks to address the complexities of modern healthcare. The LDA component elucidates key diagnostic and treatment patterns from clinical narratives, while the BiLSTM network adeptly captures the temporal progression of patient care. Our model was validated against a real-world medical dataset, achieving remarkable results with an accuracy of over 90%, precision exceeding 28% improvement, recall with a 21% enhancement, and an F1 score that reflects a 25% increase over existing models. These results were obtained through comparative analysis with established models such as DeepCare, Doctor AI, and LSTM variants, showcasing the superior predictive capabilities of our LDA-BiLSTM integrated approach. This study not only advances the academic discourse on clinical pathway management but also presents a tangible tool for healthcare practitioners, promising a significant impact on the customization and efficacy of clinical pathways, thereby enhancing patient care and satisfaction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.