Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40770228›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Species-independent analysis and identification of emotional animal vocalizations.

Stavros Ntalampiras

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Stavros NtalampirasDepartment of Computer Science, University of Milan, via Celoria 18, 20133, Milan, Italy. stavros.ntalampiras@unimi.it.

Funding

European Commission European partnership for animal health and welfare
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Animal vocalizations can differ depending on the context in which they are produced and serve as an instant indicator of an animal's emotional state. Interestingly, from an evolutional perspective, it should be possible to directly compare different species using the same set of acoustic markers. This paper proposes a deep neural network architecture for analysing and recognizing vocalizations representing positive and negative emotional states. Understanding these vocalizations is critical for advancing animal health and welfare, a subject of growing importance due to its ethical, environmental, economic, and public health implications. To this end, a framework assessing the relationships between vocalizations was developed. Towards keeping all potentially relevant audio content, the constructed framework operates on log-Mel spectrograms. Similarities/dissimilarities are learned by a suitably designed Siamese Neural Network composed of convolutional layers. The formed latent space is appropriately clustered to identify the support set facilitating the emotion classification task. We employed a publicly available dataset and followed a thorough experimental protocol. The efficacy of such a scheme is shown after extensive experiments considering both classification and support set selection. Last but not least, by elaborating collectively the network's activations when processing positive and negative vocalizations, important differences in the time-frequency plane are evidenced across emotions and species, assisting their understanding from animal scientists.

Indexed as

EmotionsVocalization, AnimalAnimalsNeural Networks, ComputerSpecies SpecificityAnimal health and welfareAudio pattern recognitionLatent representationSpectral clustering

Identifiers

PMID40770228
PMCPMC12329008

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.