Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40770226›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Invulnerability bias in perceptions of artificial intelligence's future impact on employment.

Felipe Barrera-Jimenez, Jose Luis Arroyo-Barrigüete, Eduardo C Garrido-Merchán, Gonzalo Grinda-Luna

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Felipe Barrera-JimenezUniversidad Pontificia Comillas, Santalucía Chair of Analytics for Education, Calle de Alberto Aguilera, 23, Madrid, 28015, Spain. fbarrera@comillas.edu.
Jose Luis Arroyo-BarrigüeteUniversidad Pontificia Comillas, Co-director of Santalucía Chair of Analytics for Education, Calle de Alberto Aguilera, 23, Madrid, 28015, Spain.
Eduardo C Garrido-MerchánUniversidad Pontificia Comillas, Calle de Alberto Aguilera, 23, Madrid, 28015, Spain.
Gonzalo Grinda-LunaUniversidad Pontificia Comillas, Calle de Alberto Aguilera, 23, Madrid, 28015, Spain.

Funding

NORIA research project PP2023_1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The adoption of Artificial Intelligence (AI) is reshaping the labor market; however, individuals' perceptions of its impact remain inconsistent. This study investigates the presence of the Invulnerability Bias (IB), where workers perceive that AI will have a greater impact on others' jobs than on their own, and Optimism Bias by Type of Impact (OBTI), where individuals perceive AI's future impact on their own job as more positive than on others'. The study analyzes survey data collected from 201 participants, recruited through social media using convenience sampling. The data were analyzed using a combination of statistical and machine learning methods, including the Wilcoxon test, ordinary least squares regression, clustering, random forests, and decision trees. Results confirm a significant IB, but not OBTI; only 31.8% perceived AI's future impact on their own job as more positive than on others'. Analysis shows that greater knowledge of AI correlates with lower IB, suggesting that familiarity with AI reduces the tendency to externalize perceived risk. Furthermore, bias levels vary across professional sectors: healthcare, law, and public administration exhibit the highest IB, while technology-related professions show lower levels. These findings highlight the need for interventions to improve workers' awareness of AI's potential future impact on employment.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceEmploymentPerceptionAdultBiasFemaleHumansMachine LearningMaleMiddle AgedSurveys and QuestionnairesYoung AdultAI biasesArtificial intelligenceFuture of workInvulnerability biasOptimism biasUnrealistic optimism

Identifiers

PMID40770226
PMCPMC12328832

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.