ArticleScientific reports2025
A latent profile analysis of cancer survivors' return to work adaptability and the associations between its' categories and financial toxicity.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
To explore potential categories of cancer survivors' return to work adaptability, analyze associated influences, and identify the associations between different categories and financial toxicity. 412 cancer survivors were selected as participants. Data were collected using the general information questionnaire, the adaptability to return to work scale, and the comprehensive scores for financial toxicity based on patient-reported outcome measures. Cancer survivors' return to work adaptability was categorized using potential profile analysis. Financial toxicity was analyzed using multivariate logistic regression in potential categories. Cancer survivors' return to work adaptability was categorized into three groups, namely, "poor CSs-RTWA group", "moderate CSs-RTWA-adjustment group", and "high CSs-RTWA-harmonization group". Age, place of residence, education level, type of family, per capita monthly family income, main economic sources, nature of work, nature of work unit, occupation type, current working status, sick pay, financial toxicity were the factors influencing the potential categories of cancer survivors' return to work adaptability. The cancer survivors' return to work adaptability has obvious population heterogeneity and financial toxicity is an important factor influencing adaptability classification. We must focus on the cancer survivors in the group with poor adaptability. On the basis of identifying different potential categories of cancer survivors' return to work adaptability, reducing financial toxicity could be taken as an important intervention to precisely improve cancer survivors' return to work adaptability and help them achieve comprehensive physical, mental and social rehabilitation. In the future, large-scale and multi-center studies and stratified based on cancer types and cultural factors should be conducted to enhance the universality of the results.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.