ArticleScientific reports2025
Assessment of methods for evaluating structural stability of cell envelope fragments in hypersaline brines as biosignatures of ancient microbial life.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The study of biomolecular stability of proteins and lipids in extreme saline environments is critical for understanding the preservation of potential microbial biosignatures of ancient life on Earth and other planetary bodies, including Mars. In this study, we evaluate the compatibility of several analytical techniques, Nano-Differential Scanning Fluorometry (NanoDSF), Analytical Ultracentrifugation (AUC), and Differential Scanning Calorimetry (DSC) with hypersaline brine analogues of Early Earth and Early Mars conditions. Using the halophilic archaeon Halobacterium salinarum as a model, we examine the structural stability of proteins within cell envelope fragments from dead cells, focusing on their preservation potential in complex brines. The results reveal significant technical challenges in studying macromolecules in high-salinity environments, including crystallisation during DSC and NanoDSF, viscosity-related artifacts in AUC, and reduced fluorescence signals in NanoDSF due to the low tryptophan content of membrane proteins from halophilic archaea. Nevertheless, NanoDSF proved useful for analysing multi-protein systems and DSC may be applicable using new generation technology, while AUC showed limited applicability under extreme saline conditions. These findings provide crucial insights into the methodologies for studying the stability of halophilic biomolecules in brine environments and the limitations of current techniques in extreme settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.