Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40770139›Full record

ArticleEuropean radiology2026

Deep learning-based radiomics does not improve residual cancer burden prediction post-chemotherapy in LIMA breast MRI trial.

Markus H A Janse, Liselore M Janssen, Elian J M Wolters-van der Ben, Maaike R Moman, Max A Viergever, Paul J van Diest, Kenneth G A Gilhuijs

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in European radiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Markus H A JanseImage Sciences Institute, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands. m.h.a.janse-2@umcutrecht.nl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0604-1204
Liselore M JanssenImage Sciences Institute, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Elian J M Wolters-van der BenDepartment of Radiology, St. Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, The Netherlands.
Maaike R MomanDepartment of Radiology, Alexander Monro Hospital, Bilthoven, The Netherlands.
Max A ViergeverImage Sciences Institute, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Paul J van DiestDepartment of Pathology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Kenneth G A GilhuijsImage Sciences Institute, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands. k.g.a.gilhuijs@umcutrecht.nl.

Funding

Horizon 2020 755333
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThis study aimed to evaluate the potential additional value of deep radiomics for assessing residual cancer burden (RCB) in locally advanced breast cancer, after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) but before surgery, compared to standard predictors: tumor volume and subtype. MATERIALS AND

methodsThis retrospective study used a 105-patient single-institution training set and a 41-patient external test set from three institutions in the LIMA trial. DCE-MRI was performed before and after NAC, and RCB was determined post-surgery. Three networks (nnU-Net, Attention U-net and vector-quantized encoder-decoder) were trained for tumor segmentation. For each network, deep features were extracted from the bottleneck layer and used to train random forest regression models to predict RCB score. Models were compared to (1) a model trained on tumor volume and (2) a model combining tumor volume and subtype. The potential complementary performance of combining deep radiomics with a clinical-radiological model was assessed. From the predicted RCB score, three metrics were calculated: area under the curve (AUC) for categories RCB-0/RCB-I versus RCB-II/III, pathological complete response (pCR) versus non-pCR, and Spearman's correlation.

resultsDeep radiomics models had an AUC between 0.68-0.74 for pCR and 0.68-0.79 for RCB, while the volume-only model had an AUC of 0.74 and 0.70 for pCR and RCB, respectively. Spearman's correlation varied from 0.45-0.51 (deep radiomics) to 0.53 (combined model). No statistical difference between models was observed.

conclusionsSegmentation network-derived deep radiomics contain similar information to tumor volume and subtype for inferring pCR and RCB after NAC, but do not complement standard clinical predictors in the LIMA trial. KEY POINTS: Question It is unknown if and which deep radiomics approach is most suitable to extract relevant features to assess neoadjuvant chemotherapy response on breast MRI. Findings Radiomic features extracted from deep-learning networks yield similar results in predicting neoadjuvant chemotherapy response as tumor volume and subtype in the LIMA study. However, they do not provide complementary information. Clinical relevance For predicting response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer patients, tumor volume on MRI and subtype remain important predictors of treatment outcome; deep radiomics might be an alternative when determining tumor volume and/or subtype is not feasible.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsDeep LearningMagnetic Resonance ImagingNeoplasm, ResidualAdultAgedFemaleHumansImage Interpretation, Computer-AssistedMiddle AgedNeoadjuvant TherapyRadiomicsRetrospective StudiesTumor BurdenBreast MRIDeep radiomicsNeoadjuvant chemotherapyResidual cancer burdenResponse assessment

Identifiers

PMID40770139
PMCPMC12953280

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.