ArticleScientific reports2025
Non-invasive acoustic classification of adult asthma using an XGBoost model with vocal biomarkers.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Multimodal deep learning for cardiovascular disease detection using pulse wave and vocal signals: a prediction model development and validation study.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2026Article
- Conversational speech for respiratory triage in primary care: a pilot study.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- AI-RiskX: An Explainable Deep Learning Approach for Identifying At-Risk Patients During Pandemics.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- SHAP-Based Identification of Potential Acoustic Biomarkers in Patients with Post-Thyroidectomy Voice Disorder.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Traditional diagnostic methods for asthma, a widespread chronic respiratory illness, are often limited by factors such as patient cooperation with spirometry. Non-invasive acoustic analysis using machine learning offers a promising alternative for objective diagnosis by analyzing vocal characteristics. This study aimed to develop and validate a robust classification model for adult asthma using acoustic features from the vocalized /ɑː/ sound. In a case-control study, voice recordings of the /ɑː/ sound were collected from a primary cohort of 214 adults and an independent external validation cohort of 200 adults. This study extracted features using a modified extended Geneva Minimalistic Acoustic Parameter Set and compared seven machine learning models. The top-performing model, Extreme Gradient Boosting, was further assessed through ten-fold cross-validation, external validation, and feature analysis using SHapley Additive exPlanations and Local Interpretable Model-Agnostic Explanations. The Extreme Gradient Boosting classifier achieved the highest performance on the test set, with an accuracy of 0.8514, an Area Under the Curve of 0.9130, a recall of 0.8804, a precision of 0.8387, an F1-score of 0.8567, a Kappa coefficient of 0.7018, and a Matthews Correlation Coefficient of 0.7071. On the external validation set, the model maintained strong performance with an accuracy of 0.8100, AUC of 0.8755, recall of 0.8300, precision of 0.7981, F1-score of 0.8137, Kappa of 0.6200, and Matthews Correlation Coefficient of 0.6205. Interpretability analysis identified formant frequencies as the most significant acoustic predictors. An Extreme Gradient Boosting model utilizing features from the extended Geneva Minimalistic Acoustic Parameter Set is an accurate and viable non-invasive method for classifying adult asthma, holding significant potential for developing accessible tools for early diagnosis, remote monitoring, and improved asthma management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.