ArticleScientific reports2025
Contrastive representation learning with transformers for robust auditory EEG decoding.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- ADT Network: A Novel Nonlinear Method for Decoding Speech Envelopes From EEG Signals.Trends in hearingArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Decoding of continuous speech from electroencephalography (EEG) presents a promising avenue for understanding neural mechanisms of auditory processing and developing applications in hearing diagnostics. Recent advances in deep learning have improved decoding accuracy. However, challenges remain due to the low signal-to-noise ratio of the recorded brain signals. This study explores the application of contrastive learning, a self-supervised learning technique, to learn robust latent representations of EEG signals. We introduce a novel model architecture that leverages contrastive learning and transformer networks to capture relationships between auditory stimuli and EEG responses. Our model is evaluated on two tasks from the ICASSP 2023 Auditory EEG Decoding Challenge: a binary stimulus classification task (match-mismatch) and stimulus envelope decoding. We achieve state-of-the-art performance on both tasks, significantly outperforming previous winners with 87% accuracy in match-mismatch classification and a 0.176 Pearson correlation in envelope regression. Furthermore, we investigate the impact of model architecture, training set size, and finetuning on decoding performance, providing insights into the factors influencing model generalizability and accuracy. Our findings underscore the potential of contrastive learning for advancing the field of auditory EEG decoding and its potential applications in clinical settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.