ArticleScientific reports2025
In silico decrypting of the bystander effect in antibody-drug conjugates for breast cancer therapy.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Antibody-drug conjugate engineering: from design to efficacy and safety.Signal transduction and targeted therapy · 2026Review
- Exatecan Payload-Based Antibody-Drug Conjugates with a Short Hydrophilic Cleavable Linker.ACS medicinal chemistry letters · 2026Article
- Mechanisms of Resistance and Synergy: The Role of Tumor Microenvironment in HER2-Low Breast Cancer Therapy.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Bispecific antibody-drug conjugates: a modular blueprint for next-generation cancer therapeutics.Archives of pharmacal research · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Antibody-Drug Conjugates (ADCs) are a promising cancer treatment that deliver toxic drugs directly to cancer cells, reducing harm to healthy tissue. A key feature of newer ADCs is the "bystander effect," in which nearby cancer cells are also affected by passive diffusion. However, the mechanisms underlying this effect remain unclear. Using computer simulations, this study investigates how the drug's ionization state and the linker connecting it to the antibody influence its ability to cross cell membranes. The results show that the ionization state of the drug impacts its membrane permeability, as charged molecules encounter resistance when moving through the membrane's hydrophobic core. Moreover, the study reveals that the linker increases the drug's overall size and hydrophobicity, thereby hindering its diffusion to adjacent cells. This finding suggests that linker design can significantly influence the efficacy of antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) by limiting their ability to reach neighboring cancer cells. These insights enhance our understanding of ADC mechanisms and provide a valuable foundation for the optimization of next-generation ADC therapies targeting breast cancer.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.