Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40770015›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Predict the writer's trait emotional intelligence from reproduced calligraphy.

Ruimin Lyu, Wen Sun, Yongle Cheng, Yifei Shi, Ning Wang, Joydeep Bhattacharya, Guoying Yang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Ruimin LyuJiangnan University, Wuxi, 214122, China.
Wen SunJiangnan University, Wuxi, 214122, China.
Yongle ChengJiangnan University, Wuxi, 214122, China.
Yifei ShiJiangnan University, Wuxi, 214122, China.
Ning WangJiangnan University, Wuxi, 214122, China.
Joydeep BhattacharyaGoldsmiths, University of London, London, UK, England.
Guoying YangJiangnan University, Wuxi, 214122, China. guoyingyang@jiangnan.edu.cn.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Trait emotional intelligence (EI) describes an individual's ability to control their emotions. In Chinese calligraphy, there is a saying that "the character reflects the person." This raises a hypothesis: is it possible to predict a writer's trait EI from their calligraphy reproductions? To test this hypothesis, we propose a predictive method that integrates deep learning with aesthetic features of calligraphy. First, a hard pen calligraphy reproduction dataset was constructed, consisting of 48,826 reproduced characters from 191 participants, with corresponding trait EI scores and reproduction skill score ratings. A Siamese neural network was then used to extract deep feature differences between the reproduction characters and the reference characters, which were further combined with handcrafted features for regression-based predictions. Experimental results show that, using Mean Absolute Error (MAE), Mean Squared Error (MSE) and Pearson Correlation Coefficient (PCC) as evaluation metrics, this method's ability to predict the writer's trait EI from calligraphy reproductions (MAE: 0.463, MSE: 0.462, PCC: 0.730) significantly outperforms human evaluative abilities (MAE: 1.006, MSE: 1.740, PCC: 0.145), confirming that calligraphy reproductions indeed contain latent information about the writer's trait EI.

Indexed as

Emotional IntelligenceHandwritingAdultDeep LearningEmotionsFemaleHumansMaleNeural Networks, ComputerYoung AdultCalligraphy psychologyComputational aestheticsComputer assisted assessmentPsychological projection experimentSiamese neural networkTrait EI prediction

Identifiers

PMID40770015
PMCPMC12328608

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.