Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40769996›Full record

ReviewNature communications2025

Mechanobiology of the blood-brain barrier during development, disease and ageing.

Simon Konig, Vignesh Jayarajan, Selina Wray, Roger Kamm, Emad Moeendarbary

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Nature communications, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
36citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

36 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Expanding roles of cGAS-STING signaling in neuroinflammation.The Journal of clinical investigation · 2026
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Understanding Glioblastoma Dynamics Using 3D Organoids and Engineered Extracellular Matrix.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Simon KonigDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, University College London, London, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1052-0304
Vignesh JayarajanDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, University College London, London, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1185-3274
Selina WrayUCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, University College London, London, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3062-7050
Roger KammDepartment of Biological Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, USA. rdkamm@mit.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7232-304X
Emad MoeendarbaryDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, University College London, London, UK. e.moeendarbary@ucl.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7019-3907

Funding

Cancer Research UK (CRUK) C57744/A22057RCUK | Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BBSRC) BB/V001418/1RCUK | Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC) EP/W009889/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The blood-brain barrier (BBB) preserves brain health through selective permeability, and its disruption is a hallmark of many neurological disorders. Mechanical stimuli such as shear stress and cyclic strain are increasingly recognised to influence BBB integrity and function, while alterations in tissue stiffness and extracellular matrix composition contribute to its breakdown during ageing and disease. Despite its importance, BBB mechanobiology remains underexplored. Here we highlight the central role of mechanics in BBB development, pathology, and ageing, identify key knowledge gaps, and argue that combining innovative BBB model systems with mechanical probing techniques could transform therapeutic strategies targeting brain vascular dysfunction.

Indexed as

AgingBlood-Brain BarrierAnimalsBiomechanical PhenomenaBrainHumansStress, Mechanical

Identifiers

PMID40769996
PMCPMC12328666

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.