ArticleScientific reports2025
Distinguishing the flow of airborne microorganisms along with environmental conditions and their influence on historic heritage buildings.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The National Theater of Costa Rica is a national symbol of our country and an important architectural landmark. It was built in 1897 and is decorated with large-format paintings made by Italian artists. One of these painters was Paolo Serra, who was in charge of decorating three chambers, including the Management's Office (MO). A yearly volumetric air sampling was conducted in seven rooms of the theater, showing high levels of circulating fungal spores in the MO. Thus, further analysis was carried out in this venue. First, the environmental conditions (wind velocity, temperature, relative humidity, and particles) were monitored. Then, the air and particles' flow and the probability of particles concentration were simulated for different scenarios of natural ventilation using a Discrete Phase Model. This allowed us to identify areas where damage and microorganisms were probably more prevalent. The artworks in this chamber were analyzed to determine the types of damages identified: buckling, cracks, cuts, craquelure, holes, scratches, color gaps with exposed fabric or wall, insect debris, flaking, humidity stains, interventions of old restorations, opaque stains, whitish stains and total loss of the original image. As a complement, a microbiological sample was held in 34 sites of interest, resulting in the isolation and identification of five bacterial isolates and thirteen fungi. We identified the artist's main colour palette: madder lake, lead white, calcium carbonate, yellow ocher, natural ultramarine and natural barite. We can conclude that artworks under non-controlled environmental conditions may present a significant degree of deterioration, biodeterioration, and chromatic alteration.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.