Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40769965›Full record

ReviewNature communications2025

How thoughtful experimental design can empower biologists in the omics era.

Maggie R Wagner, Manuel Kleiner

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Nature communications, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Fungal ecology in the age of 'omics.The New phytologist · 2026
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Maggie R WagnerDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Kansas, Lawrence, KS, USA. maggie.r.wagner@ku.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6924-7226
Manuel KleinerDepartment of Plant and Microbial Biology, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6904-0287

Funding

Metaproteomics to investigate intestinal microbiota-host and -diet interactionsR35GM138362 · NIGMS · NORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIVERSITY RALEIGH · PI KLEINER, MANUEL · 2020 to 2024
$1.9M
National Science Foundation (NSF) IOS-2016351 and IOS-2033621NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM138362United States Department of Agriculture | Agricultural Research Service (USDA Agricultural Research Service) 2022-67013-36672U.S. Department of Health & Human Services | NIH | National Institute of General Medical Sciences (NIGMS) R35GM138362
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The modern biology toolbox continues to evolve, as cutting-edge molecular techniques complement some classic approaches and replace others. However, statistical literacy and experimental design remain critical to the success of any empirical research, regardless of which methods are used to collect data. This Perspective highlights common experimental design pitfalls and explains how to avoid them. We discuss principles of experimental design that are relevant for all biology research, along with special considerations for projects using -omics approaches. Established best practices for optimizing sample size, randomizing treatments, including positive and negative controls, and reducing noise (e.g., blocking and pooling) can empower researchers to conduct experiments that become useful contributions to the scientific record, even if they generate negative results. They also reduce the risk of introducing bias, drawing incorrect conclusions, or wasting effort and resources on experiments with low chances of success. Although experimental design strategies are often covered in undergraduate- and graduate-level courses and in textbooks, here we provide a succinct overview and highlight their relevance to modern biology research. This Perspective can be used in training of early-career scientists and as a refresher for seasoned scientists.

Indexed as

BiologyGenomicsResearch DesignHumans

Identifiers

PMID40769965
PMCPMC12328601

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.