ReviewNature communications2025
How thoughtful experimental design can empower biologists in the omics era.
Review in Nature communications, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Unlocking the full potential of spatial omics in plants: practical challenges, solutions, and a path forward.The Plant cell · 2026Review
- Irritable Bowel Disease: Think Malonic and Methylmalonic Aciduria (CMAMMA)!JIMD reports · 2026Article
- Mapping ovarian cellular and molecular landscape across the lifespan of women: a scoping review.Human reproduction update · 2026Article
- Statistical Principles Define an Open-Source Differential Analysis Workflow for Mass Spectrometry Imaging Experiments with Complex Designs.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Fungal ecology in the age of 'omics.The New phytologist · 2026Review
- Multimodal bioinformatic analyses of genome-scale expression beyond gene-centric differential expression.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2026Review
- Comprehensive evaluation of statistical approaches for differential metaproteomics.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- The gut microbiota in high-altitude medicine: intersection of hypoxic adaptation and disease management.Frontiers in microbiology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The modern biology toolbox continues to evolve, as cutting-edge molecular techniques complement some classic approaches and replace others. However, statistical literacy and experimental design remain critical to the success of any empirical research, regardless of which methods are used to collect data. This Perspective highlights common experimental design pitfalls and explains how to avoid them. We discuss principles of experimental design that are relevant for all biology research, along with special considerations for projects using -omics approaches. Established best practices for optimizing sample size, randomizing treatments, including positive and negative controls, and reducing noise (e.g., blocking and pooling) can empower researchers to conduct experiments that become useful contributions to the scientific record, even if they generate negative results. They also reduce the risk of introducing bias, drawing incorrect conclusions, or wasting effort and resources on experiments with low chances of success. Although experimental design strategies are often covered in undergraduate- and graduate-level courses and in textbooks, here we provide a succinct overview and highlight their relevance to modern biology research. This Perspective can be used in training of early-career scientists and as a refresher for seasoned scientists.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.