ArticleThe journal of prevention of Alzheimer's disease2025
Medical risk factors, ApoE haplotype, and Alzheimer's disease: a large-scale analysis.
Article in The journal of prevention of Alzheimer's disease, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- New Hybrid Benzothiazole Derivatives from Gallic and Syringic Acid as a Potential Multifunctional Skin Disease.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Gene-Environment Interactions for Alzheimer's Disease Pathology in Cognitively Normal Adults: The CABLE Study.European journal of neurology · 2026Article
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe multifactorial nature of Alzheimer's disease (AD) has become increasingly evident. In addition to well-established features like neurodegeneration, amyloid-beta and tau deposition, or glial changes, other processes-such as metabolic, circulatory, and inflammatory factors-may also play a key role in driving or accelerating AD-related pathology and cognitive decline. These factors represent important targets for slowing disease progression.
objectivesAlthough many studies have examined individual risk factors and meta-analyses have been performed, a large-scale, comprehensive comparison using formal medical data from a single, unified cohort is needed.
designA retrospective case-control study leveraging comprehensive health database.
settingData were obtained from the UK-Biobank, a large (∼500 K people) population-based biomedical database in the United Kingdom.
participantsThe study included participants aged 40-69 at enrollment between 2006 and 2010, comprising 3,843 individuals who were clinically diagnosed with AD by August 2022 and 387,275 individuals without dementia or cognitive-impairment diagnoses. MEASUREMENTS: ICD-10-coded diagnoses, recorded at least 10 years prior to AD diagnosis, were analyzed. Logistic regression was used to estimate the impact and significance of various medical conditions and their interactions with genetic risk factors, while accounting for demographic determinants.
resultsThe analysis identified 45 medical factors (96 ICD-10 entities) across multiple systems-particularly metabolic, circulatory, gastrointestinal, and sensorimotor-that significantly differentiated individuals with clinical AD from cognitively unimpaired individuals. Interaction analyses revealed that circulatory and metabolic factors had a weaker influence on AD risk in Apolipoprotein E ε4 carriers, suggesting a gene-environment interaction in disease susceptibility.
conclusionsThese findings enhance the understanding of system-level risk factors for clinical AD, highlight the relevance of less frequently reported factors in the AD prevention literature-such as gastrointestinal and sensorimotor disorders-and underscore the complex interplay between genetic susceptibility and vascular risk factors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.