ArticleWorld journal of surgery2025
Surgical Experiences of Patients From the Circumpolar North: A Scoping Review.
Article in World journal of surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Surgical Experiences of Patients From the Circumpolar North: A Scoping Review.World journal of surgery · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe Circumpolar North is an expansive region that includes the northernmost parts of the Earth, extending across the Arctic and Subarctic zones. This area, characterized by its geographical remoteness, harsh climate, limited healthcare infrastructure, and diverse patient population, creates unique challenges for the provision and delivery of surgical care. Despite existing research in this field, there is a lack of comprehensive reviews summarizing patients' distinct experiences when accessing surgical care. This scoping review, therefore, aimed to fill this gap by mapping the current literature on the surgical experiences of patients from the Circumpolar North.
methodsA scoping review methodology was employed to identify relevant, original, peer-reviewed articles across seven databases, with no limits on publication dates. Article screening and data extraction were undertaken independently by two reviewers. An iterative data analysis process was employed to categorize findings from the included studies and identify common patterns, key insights, and knowledge gaps.
resultsA total of 17 studies were included in this review. Key factors influencing the surgical care experiences of patients from the Circumpolar North were identified across four domains: (1) logistical factors, including proximity to care centers, temporary accommodations, and financial costs; (2) psychosocial factors, such as experience of medical evacuations, separation from family, and reintegration into home communities; (3) cultural factors, encompassing navigating healthcare environments, language differences, and nonverbal communication; and (4) medical factors, including patient involvement, healthcare provider interactions, and continuity of care. Several studies also highlighted patients' experiences regarding innovative models aimed at improving locally based surgical care, such as telehealth and community-based strategies.
conclusionThis review summarized the literature on the surgical care experiences of patients from the Circumpolar North. It offers insights into improving healthcare interactions and systems to better serve this population. It also highlights significant research gaps, particularly regarding Indigenous patient experiences and the impact of medical evacuations across diverse surgical specialties. Addressing these gaps through future research is crucial for deepening our understanding of surgical experiences of patients from the Circumpolar North and developing more effective, culturally competent strategies to improve patient care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.