SynthesisClinical otolaryngology : official journal of ENT-UK ; official journal of Netherlands Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology & Cervico-Facial Surgery2025
Defining the Terminology for Acute Ear Discharge in Children: Systematic Review and Expert Consensus Using the Nominal Group Technique.
Synthesis in Clinical otolaryngology : official journal of ENT-UK ; official journal of Netherlands Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology & Cervico-Facial Surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Defining the Terminology for Acute Ear Discharge in Children: Systematic Review and Expert Consensus Using the Nominal Group Technique.Clinical otolaryngology : official journal of ENT-UK ; official journal of Netherlands Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology & Cervico-Facial Surgery · 2025Pooled it
- Referral and management patterns for paediatric otorrhoea across primary and secondary care: a multicentre retrospective cohort study.Primary health care research & development · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAcute otitis media (AOM) is one of the most frequent paediatric infections. In approximately 15% of children with AOM, the tympanic membrane perforates, leading to ear discharge. This subset of children is usually more unwell and may need different treatment than those without a perforation. Therefore, terminology is required to differentiate this population from AOM without perforation. Using a consensus exercise, we aimed to standardise disease terminology for this patient group.
methodsA systematic review was performed using OVID Embase to identify the terminology used within the current published literature. The RAND version of the Nominal Group Technique was then used to gain consensus using an expert panel.
resultsThe systematic review identified 2012 abstracts which were reviewed, of which 29 manuscripts were included. A total of nine different definitions were identified within the literature. The expert panel concluded that the terminology 'acute otitis media with discharge (AOMd)' should be used when diagnosing a child with an acutely discharging ear of up to 6 weeks duration. Recurrent disease should be diagnosed when four or greater episodes occur per year. Within this disease context, the panel determined the optimal research question was to identify the best management option.
conclusionThis consensus process has proposed the terminology that should be applied for children with acute ear discharge secondary to AOM. The use of standardised terminology is essential to improve patient care and ensure homogeneity across future research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.