ReviewEuropean respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society2025
Initiation of antifibrotic treatment in fibrosing interstitial lung disease: is the clock ticking till proven progression?
Review in European respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- [Surgical Management of Lung Cancer in Patients with Interstitial Lung Disease].Zhongguo fei ai za zhi = Chinese journal of lung cancer · 2026Review
- Combination antifibrotic and immunosuppressive therapy in progressive fibrosing ILD.Sarcoidosis, vasculitis, and diffuse lung diseases : official journal of WASOG · 2026Article
- Interstitial lung abnormalities: to treat or not to treat? The hamlet dilemma.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Several interstitial lung diseases (ILDs) with different aetiologies and pathogenic mechanisms may exhibit a progressive behaviour, similar to idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis, with comparable functional decline and early mortality. Progressive pulmonary fibrosis (PPF) is not a diagnosis but rather reflects a clinical phenotype. Identifying progression is challenging as variability exists, both between different ILDs as well as in the context of the same entity. The American Thoracic Society/European Respiratory Society guidelines provide a useful framework for recognising the progressive behaviour of individual ILDs. Nevertheless, sometimes the "one-size-fits-all" approach to PPF may not lead to the best management decisions for individual patients. Real-life clinical practice presents multiple hurdles for practising clinicians and it is of utmost importance to target early those individuals that will benefit from antifibrotic treatment. This review aims to highlight several clinical points and suggest that, in certain cases, the strict rule of initiating antifibrotic treatment only upon disease progression may warrant some flexibility, particularly in the context of everyday clinical practice. Emphasis is placed on critically examining the criteria used to define progression across different ILDs, commenting on clinical issues such as disease severity at baseline, prevention of acute exacerbations, the definition of "standard treatment", the need for early access to appropriate treatment, prediction of progression, personalised medicine and an aetiologic approach. Engaging technology and artificial intelligence will play a role in the future. Until then, the best possible management decisions will rely on the judgment of treating clinicians, guided by existing evidence and patient needs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.