ArticleJournal of advanced research2026
Intelligent microfluidic device for multiplex detection and prompt warning of upper and lower respiratory tract infections.
Article in Journal of advanced research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- A direct multiplex isothermal amplification-reverse dot blot hybridization system for β-thalassemia diagnosis.Annals of hematology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionThe increasing incidence and co-infection rates of multiple respiratory diseases have emphasized the necessity for efficient and reliable multiplex diagnostic methods for respiratory pathogens.
objectiveThis study aims to develop a multiplex diagnostic tool for monitoring and early warning of respiratory infections.
methodsA portable, centrifugal and highly integrated microfluidic device based on real-time recombinase-aided amplification (RAA) assays capable of specifically identifying 15 common respiratory pathogens was developed. Its point-of-care application was validated using simulated swabs and sputum spiked with 15 pathogens. A total of 427 collected samples were employed to assess its clinical performance, in parallel with traditional extraction kits and RT-qPCR/qPCR assays. Additionally, the feasibility of its connected monitoring and early warning platform was validated across 22 scenarios in 8 cities of mainland China.
resultsThis device successfully facilitated sample-to-answer diagnostics by automating nucleic acid extraction, real-time RAA, fluorescence detection and wireless data transmission. Compared with conventional methods, this device has obvious advantages in the turnaround time (30 min for swabs and 60 min for sputum) and the detectable targets/types in a single test. The lowest detection limits of this device were 0.1 TCID
conclusionThis device provides an intelligent, portable, rapid, and sensitive platform for early diagnosis of multiple pathogens, particularly in resource-limited settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.