Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40769203›Full record

ArticleLangmuir : the ACS journal of surfaces and colloids2025

Nanostructured Microsphere Production by Osmotic Extraction of Microfluidic Emulsion Templates.

Kate A Sanders, Michael F L De Volder

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Langmuir : the ACS journal of surfaces and colloids, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Kate A SandersDepartment of Engineering, University of Cambridge, 17 Charles Babbage Road, Cambridge CB3 0FS, U.K.ORCID 0000-0001-9519-997X
Michael F L De VolderDepartment of Engineering, University of Cambridge, 17 Charles Babbage Road, Cambridge CB3 0FS, U.K.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Microscale emulsion droplets are versatile soft templates for assembling nanoparticle powders and forming secondary microparticles. When combined with microfluidics, nanostructured microparticles can be produced with precise size and uniformity. However, assembly requires removal of the droplet solvent, which is particularly slow for water-in-oil emulsions. This has been a longstanding challenge, preventing the deployment of emulsion-structured nanomaterials at scale. Here, an osmotic pressure-driven method is presented that achieves controlled water extraction from emulsion droplets. This is a faster, more cost-effective, and sustainable alternative to prolonged heating; particle solidification is achieved by introducing a second emulsion containing a high solute concentration. The effect of system composition and droplet size on the rate of water extraction, emulsion stability, and nanoparticle assembly is explored, generating an empirical model for the solidification of 100-1000 μm diameter template droplets. By combining this extraction method with microfluidic emulsification, batches of spherical microparticles were formed composed entirely of nanoparticles, in this case, carbon nanotubes as a model system. Particle solidification was up to 5 times faster than evaporation while maintaining control over morphology and size distribution. Additionally, this processing method was demonstrated on other nanoparticle systems, confirming a broad material applicability.

Identifiers

PMID40769203
PMCPMC12368995

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.